Review Index:
Feedback

ECS LIVA X2 Intel Braswell Mini-PC Review

Subject: Systems
Manufacturer: ECS

Storage, Networking, and HTPC Testing

Storage and Networking

The LIVA X2 arrived with 32 GB of onboard eMMC storage, and a version with 64 GB is also available from ECS. Users have the option of installing their own M.2 drive, but as I mentioned this might present a challenge as disassembly of the LIVA's enclosure is a little tricky compared to last year's model. I stuck with the internal drive for all testing, and after completing my Windows install I ran a quick drive benchmark to see what kind of speed users might expect.

View Full Size

While read speeds of 150 MB/s aren't bad, these are sequential numbers and certainly a best-case scenario. I was able to write from the LIVA to an SSD connected via USB 3.0 at exactly 150 MB/s through a large file transfer, indicating that this is indeed the limit of the drive's read performance. As far as writes go, however, the drive was a lackluster performer. I was able to hit just over 40 MB/s, and these speeds will limit overall snappiness when creating and moving files on the OS.

View Full Size

With write speeds limited to ~40 MB/s I didn't see a point in running Gigabit Ethernet performance testing. I will simply say that, unless you install your own SSD via M.2, there would probably be no way to realize the full bandwidth of a wired Gigabit connection on internal storage. Moving to wireless, the X2 includes an 802.11ac adapter from Realtek, where the prior versions were limited to 802.11n.

I ran a simple file transfer from my storage testbench PC, which was connected to my Linksys EA6350 router at 433 Mbps with full signal strength. This first transfer test was performed by writing to the internal eMMC on the LIVA.

View Full Size

I ran the test again, this time writing to a SATA 6.0 Gbps SSD connected via USB 3.0 to ensure that my downlink numbers weren't being limited by the write speed of the eMMC:

View Full Size

Almost identical results here, so eMMC write speed probably won't be an issue here as the Realtek wireless card only connects with a singe 802.11ac channel (1x1). In theory a 433 Mbps downlink could offer just over 50 MB/s, but with overhead this will be lower, and I have yet to see an adapter than can do better than 40 MB/s. The performance here from the LIVA X2 is average, but I will note that it's very position sensitive when it comes to reception. I had to move it around a little to get a consistent connection speed from my router, which was relatively close to the LIVA.

HTPC Testing

I wanted to spend a little more time on this aspect of the LIVA X2, as the improved graphics performance from the Braswell SoC and faster 802.11ac wireless makes this newest LIVA a more attractive option for the living room than ever. All versions of the LIVA have been passively cooled, and one of the obvious applications of a fanless mini-PC has to be the living room; the X2 even comes with a VESA mount to hide the tiny computer behind your monitor or TV. So how did this new LIVA perform in the living room?

For a test of local content playback I used both a 720p and 1080p rip of the same Blu-ray, using Handbrake to create a "normal" profile .mp4 file at default settings. I didn't need to fall back on the 720p file as I was expecting, as the 1080p file managed to play smoothly. I wouldn't expect the same performance from a full bitrate MKV file, but my ~18 Mbps file looked pretty good and played without any issue via VLC. Granted, this is 24 FPS video coming from a Blu-ray film, and anything at 60 FPS will present much more of a challenge.

View Full Size

Only 1 dropped frame in nearly an hour of 1080p playback

After local playback it was time to test streaming performance, which is going to be completely dependent on how CPU intensive your preferred application/service is. I started with YouTube, with good results up to 1080p video (all with the default HTML5 player). Switching to Netflix, I used the Chrome browser and watched a few episodes of some HD shows for about two hours without any incident. The temps reached a toasty 69 C on the Braswell SoC (68 F ambient), but this was well within spec.

Moving on to the well-known Kodi app (formerly XBMC), I played back video both locally and from a network share. Up to 1080p .mp4 video (~18 Mbps) from the same Blu-ray rip from the local test played without issue. The overall performance of Kodi was impressive to me considering this system is limited to 2 GB of memory, though Windows 8.1 seems to handle RAM a little more efficiently than Windows 7 did.

Finally, I tested out the Sling TV Windows app, and each time I had the same result with the highest quality settings, with noticeable frame drop and audio sync issues that quickly devolved into an unwatchable slideshow after a short time. This was better on the lower settings, but not great. Suspecting that the app was too much for a dual-core Braswell SoC I installed it on the Dell Inspiron laptop (quad-core Bay Trail-M) and was able to stream much more smoothly – but it still suffered from some choppiness and sync problems. Sling seems to be much more demanding than anything else I tested.

Overall I was very impressed with the HTPC performance of the new LIVA X2. Though the Braswell SoC didn't offer a real advantage over the LIVA X in the CPU benchmarks, the video performance from the X2 is improved enough to recommend this new system over the previous model for living room use.

Video News


November 4, 2015 | 02:12 PM - Posted by Dr_Orgo

Sebastian, do you think the Liva X2 or an Asus Chromebox CN60 would be better as a computer illiterate family member computing solution for light internet browsing, email, picture viewing, word processing, and gaming (solitaire)?

November 4, 2015 | 03:02 PM - Posted by Sebastian Peak

I think the CN60 would be a lot snappier considering they all use Haswell parts, especially with Chrome OS as I'm sure it's better optimized for limited hardware. The 16GB storage is a negative, as the LIVA comes with 32GB standard, but you lose half of that to the Windows install on the LIVA...

I'm torn here. If I had to use one myself I'd go with the CN60 because of the faster CPU and I'd just deal with the storage limitation by using an external drive (or high capacity SD card). Part of this comes down to price, of course. The Core i3 CN60 is about $200, LIVA X2 is about $160.

In either case I'd install Ubuntu if it was my daily driver. In my experience Linux runs better on these mini-PCs, and I'd be content with the productivity experience of LibreOffice and Firefox.

November 4, 2015 | 03:18 PM - Posted by Anonymous (not verified)

Why not look at a Mint Box with Linux Mint factory installed, if you want ease of use and a nice UI!

November 4, 2015 | 03:16 PM - Posted by Anonymous (not verified)

Go to Microcenter/Etc. and get a last generation Ivybridge or Haswell laptop NEW and on sale with windows 7/8.1! There will be core i3/i5 laptops that will have much better features for around $300 for the i3 laptop models, the i5 laptop models a little more. The GPUs in some of the Liva devices use low cost Intel Celeron/Atom SKUs that are not going to be as powerful as Intel's earlier generation regular form factor laptop(IvyBridge/Haswell) SKUs anyways. you are going to have to have a monitor and keyboard at extra costs, so the retail channels are still offering some very nice deals on NEW IvyBridge, or Haswell based laptop SKUs.

It's too bad there are not any AMD Carrizo offerings in these types of Mini devices, but that Intel contra revenue and other Intel influences are keeping AMD pushed out of some markets. Carrizo not Carrizo-L with a quad core excavator CPU and the AMD latest GCN integrated graphics would make for some nice affordable systems with better than Intel graphics, and at Carrizo's price point Intel would definitely not be offering their best graphics in any Intel SKUs!

November 4, 2015 | 03:19 PM - Posted by Jim Cherry (not verified)

You guys know office runs on the web right why even install libreoffice when office.com has excel, word, and powerpoint.

November 4, 2015 | 03:35 PM - Posted by Anonymous (not verified)

Libreoffice is going to come with the Linux distros as standard on most. I use Libreoffice and even Libreoffice can accelerate spreadsheet/other workloads on the GPU if there is openCL support for the GPU. That's why I'd love to see AMD's Carrizo SKUs on some of these Mini type devices. The AMD latest GCN graphics has the ACE units for accelerating Libreoffice and any other Application that makes use of OpenCL, and a lot of applications, open source and proprietary, are using OpenCL(for compute acceleration on the GPU), and OpenGL(for graphics). Vulkan when it is released will offer even better acceleration of graphics and non graphics computations on the GPU.

November 5, 2015 | 01:38 AM - Posted by Anonymous (not verified)

Can these mini PCs be set up to stream steam from a more powerful PC I the house?

December 18, 2015 | 04:46 AM - Posted by Anonymous (not verified)

2gb of RAM is quite frankly a useless amount to have in a modern PC. It leaves the PC constantly using its storage drive (I speak from experience here). I think the impressions would have been far better with a unit that had more integrated memory.

In this day and age where DDR3 is so cheap, having so little RAM is a warning sign that the unit has been cut down too far. While you can make do with 4gb for an office machine just doing MS Office and emails, I could not advise someone to buy a machine with less than 8gb RAM.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote><p><br>
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.