Review Index:

OCZ RevoDrive 3 x2 480GB PCIe SSD Review - Seriously Fast Storage

Subject: Storage
Manufacturer: OCZ Technology
Tagged: ssd, PCIe SSD, pcie, ocz

Internals, Testing Methodology and System Setup


Well, there really are no internals to a PCIe SSD, so here are some close-ups:

View Full Size

One of 4 SandForce controllers, coupled with IMFT 25nm flash memory.

View Full Size

The VCA 2.0 controller (above) and some extra energy storage in the form of a bank of capacitors near an inductive filter (below).

View Full Size

More controllers and flash.

View Full Size

Edge-on, we see flash installed on both sides of both boards.

View Full Size

LED status lights let you know which controller channels are active.

Testing Methodology

Our tests are a good mix of synthetic and real-world benchmarks. PCMark, IOMeter, HDTach, HDTune, Yapt and our custom File Copy test round out the selection to cover just about all bases. If you have any questions about our tests just drop into the Storage Forum and we'll help you out!

Test System Setup

We're breaking in a new SandyBridge testbed. Necessary for properly testing these new drives, even with the known issues. To get around this, we are using only the Intel SATA 6Gb/sec ports, which are known to not exhibit the inconsistent performance / connectivity issues.

PC Perspective would like to thank ASUS, Corsair, and Kingston for supplying some of the components of our test rig. 

Hard Drive Test System Setup
CPU Intel Core i5-2500K
Motherboard Asus P8P67 Deluxe
Memory Kingston HyperX 4GB DDR3-2133 CL9
Hard Drive G.Skill 32GB SLC SSD
Sound Card N/A
Video Card BFG Geforce 8400 GS 512MB PCI
Video Drivers Geforce 181.22
Power Supply Corsair CMPSU-650TX
DirectX Version DX9.0c
Operating System Windows 7 X64


  • PCMark05
  • Yapt
  • IOMeter
  • HDTach
  • HDTune
  • PCPer File Copy Test

Video News

June 28, 2011 | 12:34 PM - Posted by Chris Topher (not verified)

Great review Allyn. You mentioned that the RevoDrive would be good for entry-level servers or high performance work stations. Would the Raid 0 nature of the RevoDrive make you a little wary of placing this into a server environment? Maybe you're implying there would be fail over/redundancy protections in place, but at least with hard drives, I would never consider a R0 server setup for our small biz server.

Would you mind elaborating a bit?

Thanks, Chris

June 28, 2011 | 01:53 PM - Posted by Allyn Malventano

For the type of application where super-high IOPS is desired, you reach a threshold where you just can't get any higher with redundancy included in the package. For these situations you'd have to add the redundancy factor yourself, be it near-line backups or an identical controller installed into the same server and mirrored using the OS perhaps. The Revo is not unique in this bleeding-edge performance niche - the FusionIO products are not redundant either.

As a side note, many VCA controllers have a mode equivalent to RAID-5. This silicon is fast enough to include parity for one (or two) drive failures with a minimal performance hit. OCZ could probably enable this, perhaps for a more purely business-oriented model, but I don't see it as that high of a need really. It would be a niche of what is already a niche to begin with!

Consider that adding parity to support failure of one of the SandForce channels. That's some form of chip failure - be it the SandForce or its bank of flash. There's plenty of other chips on a RevoDrive that are common to the unit as a whole, and a failure of one of those will still take the whole card down (single point failure). If redundancy was so important for a very high performance application, I would rather skip the parity calculation overhead / capacity reduction and go straight for the '2 of everything' approach. Added bonus - a pair of these mirrored at the OS level would have the write performance of a single unit, but read performance would be doubled, so you would *further* increase performance and add redundancy at the same time. That's a win-win not possible with overhead-inducing RAID / parity-based solutions.

Also note: You could buy 2 of the 960GB models for *less* than a single ioDrive 160. Ouch.


June 28, 2011 | 02:31 PM - Posted by dgingeri (not verified)

It's nice, but for $1600 you can get a 3Ware 9750 controller and 4 Vertex 3 120GB drives, get the same capacity, 512MB of buffer, and a wider interface, for $100 cheaper. I think I'd rather go that way.

July 6, 2011 | 12:19 PM - Posted by Allyn Malventano

The interface is irrelevant if the controller itself is the bottleneck. If the 3Ware can manage to peg the PCIe interface in sequential reads, that's great, but only marginally better than what the OCZ unit can do (as it's nearly saturating all 4 SSD's).

The LSISAS2108 chip (on the 3Ware 9750) is only rated at 1.1GB/sec sequential writes, while the Revo3 hits close to 1.6GB/sec. That's a 50% reduction in performance.

The LSISAS2108 will very likely come nowhere near the Revo3's 200k IOPS rating in random access. Every RAID solution I've tested tops out at roughly the peak IOPS of *1* good SSD (~50k IOPS). This is due to the latency added by managing the cache. 512MB RAM caches are for HDD's, not SSD's. While I haven't personally tested the LSISAS2108 / 3Ware 9750, I'd be shocked if it could break 100k.

August 13, 2011 | 11:34 AM - Posted by Birdofprey (not verified)

That does raise a question: THis and the previous Revodrives are internal RAID 0 devices, so why don't you test it against RAID setups? Of course it's going to blow a lone SSD out of the water. So would a quartet of those same SSDs attached to a RAID controller, so that doesn't, by itself, constitute a reason to get one of these.

I have heard the some comment about why not just get a raid controller and a couple of SSDs instead regarding the original revo too. Some data that supports one of those options is much more useful than including a HDD for us to laugh at.

June 28, 2011 | 03:27 PM - Posted by Tommy (not verified)

I have had plenty of experience with the Revo and Revo2. I wish to express my words of caution of using the Revo3 as a boot drive. With many weeks of testing several motherboards and adjustings various BIOS's. The Revo's could never become stable as a boot drive. Somehow, files would always become corrupt. As a secondary drive, for placing the pagefile, all temp files and general work files. The revo's are mind blowing fast. No doubt, by looking at the numbers for the Revo3, it will impress anyone.

June 29, 2011 | 08:52 AM - Posted by dreamer77dd (not verified)

i would only get this storage as a boot drive. I wonder what Allyn has to say about that. i would put in the review that it is a boot-able drive though. i am not sure how you would test it for instability as a boot drive. i dont heard in the news about issues of things being corrupt and such. I will keep this in mind.
i like this storage drive though, hate to hear bad things about it.

July 6, 2011 | 11:59 AM - Posted by Allyn Malventano

I've tested all three Revo's in a boot configuration and never noted any corruption issues. Revo / x2 were tested under XP and XP64. I've only tested Revo3 under 32-bit (Win 7) as we don't yet have signed 64 bit drivers, which precludes install without additional hackery.

June 29, 2011 | 08:18 AM - Posted by Tim Verry

That is one sexy piece of silicon lol

July 1, 2011 | 09:27 AM - Posted by Anonymous (not verified)

Well, i am using a revodrive as boot drive for over a year and ir never fails a boot or damage files...

July 4, 2011 | 06:49 AM - Posted by Anonymous (not verified)

Are you aware of this Allyn?

"However I was wondering about TRIM support, as the last time I checked it needs to be supported by Microsoft. A question that I had to verify with OCZ. Though the Revo3 card supports TRIM, because the architecture is based on SCSI, the Microsoft Windows StorPort architecture currently does not support either TRIM or SCSI UNMAP. As such, these commands are not generated by the OS, which of course prevents VCA from executing them. OCZ is working with Microsoft to have this functionality enabled as soon as possible. So that will take a RAID driver update alright, but that should not effect your data already on the drive."


Anandtech and tomshardware say something similar.
Apparently TRIM only works on Linux as of now.

July 6, 2011 | 11:56 AM - Posted by Allyn Malventano

Yes. TRIM won't pass through StorPort until Microsoft adds support for this functionality to Windows. This will likely come in the form of a hotfix, but the ETA on that is totally up to Microsoft.

As with other SF-controlled devices, keep in mind they are very resilient to the performance hit seen when used without TRIM. The same applies to the Revo3.

August 12, 2011 | 07:02 PM - Posted by Sean G (not verified)

What an insightful and well-written review. Its good to see PC Perspective attracting such great talent! I look forward to more of your articles.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote><p><br>
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.