Review Index:
Feedback

ASUS Maximus VIII Extreme Motherboard Review

Subject: Motherboards
Manufacturer: ASUS

Overclocking and Conclusion

Overclocking

To give a feel for the overclocking performance potential of the Maximus VIII Extreme motherboard, we attempted to push it to known CPU-supported performance parameters with minimal tweaking. The board was able to hit a maximum base clock speed of 267MHz with a CPU speed of 4.5GHz, a matching 4.5GHz ring bus speed, and a 2490MHz memory speed. With the base clock rolled back to 167MHz, we were able to push the CPU to 4.67GHz with a 4.5GHz ring bus and 2672Mhz memory speeds. With the base clock rolled back to its stock 100Mhz speed, we pushed the CPU to 4.6GHz with a 4.5GHz ring bus and 3466MHz memory speeds. All overclocking sessions remained stable for over 4hrs. System stability was tested running the AIDA64 stability test in conjunction with EVGA's OC Scanner X graphical benchmark running at 1280x1024 resolution and 8x MSAA in stress test mode. Note that 16GB (2 x 8GB) of Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-2666 and 16GB (4 x 4GB) of Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3200 memory modules were used for the overclocking tests.

267MHz Base Clock Stats

View Full Size

View Full Size

167MHz Base Clock Stats

View Full Size

View Full Size

100MHz Base Clock Stats with 3466MHz Memory

View Full Size

View Full Size

Note that this is is meant only as a quick preview of the board's performance potential. With more time to tweak the settings to a greater extent, pushing to a higher base clock and ring bus speed may have been achievable, in addition to an overnight stability run without issue.

Performance

The Maximus VIII Extreme motherboard lives up to its extreme moniker, performing up to expectations under both stock and overclocked conditions. Its peripherals and subsystems all performed flawlessly as well, owing to the boards over-engineered design and build quality.

Pricing

As of July 22, the ASUS Maximus VIII Extreme motherboard was available at Amazon.com for $479.70 with Prime shipping. The board was also available from Newegg.com for $484.99 and from B&H for $479.70.

View Full Size

Conclusion

ASUS has another beast on their hands with the Maximus VIII Extreme motherboard. Holding the "Flagship" moniker for the ASUS ROG Z170 board line, the board is chock full of features and accessories including the latest edition of their OC Panel device. The Maximus VII Extreme was as pretty to look at as it was over-engineered (which also ups the aesthetic factor for me). ASUS designed the beast with a full 13 dedicated power phases for the CPU alone, meaning that the board was made to put up with anything you could throw at it and engineered for world record performance. With the exception of the CMOS battery placement, the integrated component layout was well thought out and implement with more than adequate space to use the board's numerous features.

Strengths

  • Stock performance
  • Overclocking performance
  • Board aesthetics, layout, and design
  • Motherboard manual details and quality
  • UEFI BIOS design and usability
  • Intel GigE network controller performance
  • CMOS battery placement
  • M.2 port placement
  • OC Panel II device inclusion
  • Design and spacing for the VRM and PLX heat pipe cooling loop
  • Configurable chipset LED

Weaknesses

  • Price
  • CMOS battery placement

View Full Size


August 8, 2016 | 12:45 PM - Posted by Balthazar2k4 (not verified)

"Holding the "Flagship" moniker for the ASUS ROG Z170 board line, the board is shock full of features and accessories including the latest edition of their OC Panel device."

Try chock-full instead of shock full.

August 8, 2016 | 12:51 PM - Posted by Sebastian Peak

I'm shocked by this comment.

August 8, 2016 | 01:58 PM - Posted by Morry Teitelman

Thanks, fixed...

August 8, 2016 | 01:34 PM - Posted by quest4glory

Test System Setup shows GTX 780. Pic shows a Palit GTX 570 label? I don't really care, just thought that was inconsistent.

Also, can we not get great CMOS battery placement with a $500 motherboard? This doesn't seem like too much to ask.

August 12, 2016 | 08:49 AM - Posted by Anonymous (not verified)

I agree, the CMOS battery tech hasn't changed since the conception of integrated circuits...what gives..?

August 8, 2016 | 01:47 PM - Posted by larry345 (not verified)

I would call that a clever play on words Mr. Dictionary. If not a little callous don't you think?

August 8, 2016 | 02:44 PM - Posted by Anonymous (not verified)

Doesn't make much sense to have such an expensive board on a socket that can only use midrange CPUs

August 8, 2016 | 04:02 PM - Posted by quest4glory

Fastest possible single threaded performance out there. It matters for some people and some apps.

August 8, 2016 | 08:35 PM - Posted by Anonymous (not verified)

How much more performance are we talking for spending two or three times the amount for this board instead of something else?

August 9, 2016 | 04:00 AM - Posted by Anonymous (not verified)

Fair enough, although I wonder if LGA2011 can clock higher than mainstream chips when good cooling is used (custom water or better), as the lack of soldered heat spreader on mainstream chips should cause a heat bottleneck that reduces scaling with improved coolers

August 8, 2016 | 10:58 PM - Posted by brucek2

I get that there's always a market for the best of the best (even if small.)

What's confused me though about this and previous similar offerings from ASUS is the timing. The Z170 chipset is nearly a year old. Are there really people who want the best of the best, cost no concern, but were twiddling their thumbs for a year? I would have imagined that set of buyers upgraded their rigs long ago.

Or are there really people that rebuild their already top-end rig at this point in the cycle? Even disregarding cost, seems like a lot of hassle for little performance returns left on the table?

August 9, 2016 | 09:04 PM - Posted by Zaxx (not verified)

Man....this thing has ALL the bells and whistles...as well it should. At $500 it better gimme a chubby every time it posts...lol

One thing that doesn't make sense...an ASMedia 1061 (from 2012) for the 2 additional sata 6gbs/usb 3 ports...pretty much a turd on an otherwise nice lawn. I guess if u can afford a $500 non-X99 mobo, you'll prolly be pimpin a $300 raid card too...lol

August 19, 2016 | 04:30 PM - Posted by Anonymous (not verified)

Why is a board almost a year old just now being reviewed?

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote><p><br>
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.