Review Index:

Intel Ivy Bridge Core i5-3427U / Ultrabook Platform Review: Making Slower Faster

Subject: Mobile
Manufacturer: Intel

Introduction, Product Specifications And Line-Up

View Full Size

Earlier this year I penned an editorial about ultrabooks. It wasn’t all that nice. I pointed out that they are slow, that they require design sacrifices that not everyone will enjoy and that ultraportables often provide a better experience at the same price or lower. 

Since then I’ve also discovered, through various reviews, that ultrabooks so far have not shown any battery life advantage over ultraportables. The advantage of a low-voltage processor is consistently negated by the smaller batteries squeezed into Intel’s thin form-factor.

I’m not on the bandwagon. This, however, should not come as a surprise. It’s exceedingly rare for a company, even of Intel’s size, to knock a new product out of the park on its first try. The models that released so far were decent products in some ways, but they were also the hardware equivalent of a beta. Intel and laptop manufacturers are now responding to what they’ve discovered.

View Full Size

This brings us to Ivy Bridge. As I noted in my Ivy Bridge for mobile review, Intel’s architectural update seems to be more exciting for laptops than for desktops. The Core i7-3720QM we received in our Ivy Bridge reference laptop was a beast, easily defeating all previous processor benchmarks and also posting surprisingly good results in gaming tests. Despite this, battery life seemed to at least remain the same. 

Continue reading our review of the Intel Ivy Bridge Core i5-3427U for Ultrabooks!!

But that was a high-end component. Less powerful processors have to make sacrifices to achieve low-voltage heaven. That means lower clock speeds (on both the CPU and IGP) and fewer cores. Can Ivy Bridge still impress despite these constraints, and just as importantly, has Intel managed to squeeze more life out of less battery? Let’s find out.

Product Specifications And Line-Up

View Full Size

There are effectively two components that we’re testing in this review. One is the processor. Our Intel reference platform arrived with a Core i5-3427U clocked at 1.8 GHz. The single-core Turbo Boost max sits at 2.8 GHz, while the dual-core Turbo Boost max is 2.6 GHz. This is the first time I can recall seeing Intel publish tiered Turbo Boost numbers. 

This particular part is a mid-range entry into Intel’s launch products. As you can see on the chart below, Intel is offering just four products at this time, none of which are Core i3 models (though I am sure we’ll see those within a few months). Pricing is still high for these processors, with the Core i5-3427U being listed at $225 and the top-end Core i7-3667U coming in at $346. All the parts, regardless of capability, have been listed with a 17W TDP.

View Full Size

There have been rumors that we’ll soon see $600 or $700 ultrabooks. That may the case, but judging from these numbers they’d have to be running Core i3 low-voltage products or perhaps older Sandy-Bridge low-voltage processors. Even then, the other specifications would have to be rather poor to fit in at $600.

The maximum graphics frequency has been downgraded slightly in comparison to the Core i7-3720QM, retreating from 1250 MHz to 1150 MHz. The minimum frequency is also quite low at 350 MHz, which is much lower than the 650MHz figure we’ve seen in Intel HD 4000 products so far. It will be interesting to see how much of an impact these reductions have in real-world gaming.

Clock speed differences aside, this is Ivy Bridge. The architecture is the same as the processors that have already been released and reviewed. If you’d like to find out more about Ivy Bridge in general I suggest that you read our desktop and mobile reviews. 

May 31, 2012 | 01:04 AM - Posted by theautumnsbest

there's a typo in Battlefield 3, 1366x7768 resolution :-D

May 31, 2012 | 10:59 AM - Posted by Ryan Shrout

No no, that's totally legit! :D

I'm sure Matt will fix it is today.

March 11, 2014 | 08:03 PM - Posted by Alejandro (not verified)

You can own and control virtual pets, learn new crafts and join in virtual festivities.
Online games have began to evolve with the Internet. Or, and this I'd really like, the game could send an army
of elite monsters to that outpost to deal with those pesky I've
never been a huge fan of Pv - P, mostly because it wasn't implemented
interesting enough.

Stop by my web-site ...

June 1, 2012 | 08:19 PM - Posted by Matt Smith


May 31, 2012 | 07:57 AM - Posted by greg.j (not verified)

Hey guys-
Battlefield 3 FPS graph has a resolution of 1366x7768

May 31, 2012 | 04:34 PM - Posted by Yangorang (not verified)

So do you guys know what kind of frequencies the GPU was running at while benchmarking games? I am curious as to whether better cooling / lower ambient temps could actually net you signaficantly better or worse framerates.

May 31, 2012 | 04:53 PM - Posted by Anonymous (not verified)

Any openCL benchmarks?

September 18, 2013 | 07:13 PM - Posted by Hye (not verified)

Hi there to all, how is the whole thing, I think every one is
getting more from this site, and your views are good in favor of new people.

my blog: free reverse phone lookup with name,,

September 11, 2014 | 04:55 PM - Posted by Anonymous (not verified)

I have a i5 3470 I use a R9 270 with (basically a re-badge 7870 with faster memory and lower GPU clock) For SHTZ n giggles I tried out the on-board Intel HD-2500 GPU which is a heavily stripped down HD-4000, And it actually surprised me, You can actually run Mafia 2 on lowest settings, It looks like crap but you can play it, I tried Watch Dogs LOL and well it ran, But unless you are absolutely desperate I would not consider it playable at all on the HD-2500 But this means it is possible it could on the HD-4000 with everything turned down. But honestly gaming is for a GPU that cost at'least over $110 bucks. But still I was very impressed with the sabotaged Intel GPU, It did much better than I thought it would.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote><p><br>
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.