Remember when buying a Blu-ray reader would double the value of your PC?

Subject: Storage | August 29, 2011 - 05:19 PM |
Tagged: plextor, PX-LB950UE, bluray, external drive

That isn't the case anymore as you can pick up the Plextor PX-LB950UE for $220 and plug it in externally to burn single or dual layer Blu-ray disks, as well as DVDs.  With both USB 3.0 and eSATA connections you should have no trouble with compatibility and you will want the fast transfer rates due to the volume of data that Blu-ray can handle.  Unfortunately PCStats could not get the Plextor to play back the movie that they were using for testing, no matter what software they tried to use to play it.  A diagnostic showed nothing wrong with the disk nor with the player and a Google search showed that many people have similar problems with a wide variety of disks and players.  They did have a very early version of the firmware; perhaps an updated version will resolve that particular problem.  Certainly something to keep in mind before picking up this external drive.

View Full Size

"In recent weeks the talk of the town has been a sleek black external 12x Blu-ray WRITER from the folks at Plextor. The Plextor PX-LB950UE connects via USB 3.0 or eSATA cables and is capable of burning single layer Blu-ray Disk (BD) media at 12x, double layer BD media at 8x and DVD-R media at 16x speeds. In addition, it supports the playback of Blu-ray 3D movie titles. The bonus to going the Blu-ray writer route, is that BD-R media is even more useful than DVD media for archiving MASSIVE amounts of data."

Here are some more Storage reviews from around the web:


Source: PC Stats

Video News

August 31, 2011 | 08:08 AM - Posted by Anonymous (not verified)

Haven't external hard drives replaced optical media and aren't the actual media still way too expensive relative to hard drive backup (even multiple hard drive backup)?

October 23, 2011 | 02:42 PM - Posted by Anonymous (not verified)

Right you are. Common optical media breaks down quickly, so it is in no way safer than any other storage media. Also, the "MASSIVE" amounts of data the article mentions are unfortunately laughable. 25 GB is NOTHING, especially when storing raw photos.

Buy an external 2 TB hard drive instead. It's dirt cheap and fits the content of ~80 bd-r discs. It's also a LOT faster and a LOT more convenient. Don't want to trust a single hard drive with all of your archive storage? Well, then buy two. Or three. From different manufacturers. Clone them.

When the hard drives become obsolete in terms of storage capacity or communication interface (usb etc), then simply buy something else in the future and transfer the content to that new device in one single go. A lot more convenient than transferring the content of truckloads of slow optical discs.

It's also quite simple to encrypt the whole hard drive using e.g. TrueCrypt. Doesn't work very well with bd-r discs, atleast not as conveniently.

The consumer optical storage market, as it is in its current state, is doomed. It's just a matter of time.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote><p><br>
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.