Rumor: Intel May Discontinue Pentium G4560 Processor

Subject: Processors | July 10, 2017 - 11:11 PM |
Tagged: value, rumor, report, processor, pentium, kaby lake, Intel, G4560, cpu, budget

Update 07/11/17: We have now heard from Intel on this subject, and they provided this statement regarding the availability of the Pentium G4560 processor:

"We continue to offer the Intel Pentium SKU referenced. What you have observed on websites are possibly part of a normal demand fluctuation."

(The original post follows.)

Cannibalization of its Core i3 sales might have Intel quietly killing off its best value CPU, if unnamed sources in a DigiWorthy report (via TechPowerUp) can be believed.

View Full Size

Image credit: ComputerBase via DigiWorthy

Sound far-fetched? It seems at least plausible that Intel might consider some sort of CPU-related moves to maintain profit margins with Ryzen providing some very real competition after several years of Intel dominance. The popularity of the 2-core/4-thread Pentium G4560 - a (theoretically) ~$60 Kaby Lake part that provides a very nearly Core i3-level experience (some features are missing) is not at all surprising, and the current lack of availability and subsequently higher pricing (lowest in-stock price at around $80 at time of publication) suggests that something is up with this CPU.

View Full Size

Chart via PCPartPicker

A low of $78.89 for the CPU with an MSRP of $64 is about a $15 markup, but this price is just going to increase if no fresh stock hits the market as these sell out.

Now some editorial: Why would Intel introduce what is essentially a slightly hobbled Core i3 into the market at half the cost of their cheapest Core i3 to begin with? I enthusiastically endorsed this seemingly questionable business decision (along with all of the buyers of this often out-of-stock CPU) when it first hit the market a few months ago, and now - if rumors are to be believed - the company might just be killing it off. This would be a move reminiscent of Nintendo's recent NES Classic, which was apparently too popular for its $59.99 price tag (and scalpers worldwide rejoiced). Nintendo, of course, killed the NES Classic when it was at its height of popularity, perhaps as it was just not profitable enough to justify continued production? (And besides, a soon-to-be-$300-on-eBay SNES Classic was in the works.)

Might the Pentium G4560 be Intel's NES Classic? It seems a little too likely for comfort.

Source: TechPowerUp

Video News

July 10, 2017 | 11:30 PM - Posted by PCPerFan1 (not verified)

Intel has a budget part that people are buying too much of, so they have to limit production or discontinue it completely?

Yup, sounds about right. Thanks Intel!

July 11, 2017 | 11:39 AM - Posted by Power (not verified)

Intel is afraid to be stuck with huge inventory of unsellable chips once AMD low cost Zen hits the market.

July 10, 2017 | 11:52 PM - Posted by biohazard918

Don't worry I'm sure they will figure out what to strip out of its replacement in the name of segmentation!

July 11, 2017 | 03:07 AM - Posted by RealExascale (not verified)

The Pentium is a weird chip. No AVX or TSX but does have ECC support, where as the more expensive LGA1151 chips dont support ECC but have TSX ad AVX. Intels artificial segmentation is absurd.

July 11, 2017 | 12:09 PM - Posted by psuedonymous

Bets on it existing because some Xeon part has a weird failure leaving a bunch of harvestable dies lying around, and now that issue has been resolved it no longer makes sense to deliberately butcher dies to make more?

July 11, 2017 | 04:14 AM - Posted by ET3D

Hopefully AMD releases something good and cheap enough with Ryzen 3 to make Intel reconsider their low end strategy.

July 11, 2017 | 07:23 AM - Posted by JohnGR

Before we see single CCX Ryzen models in the market, or Zen based APUs, the G4560 has NO competition at all. That's why Intel can limit it's availability or even cancel it with little worries.

July 11, 2017 | 04:50 AM - Posted by rcald2000

I should of purchased 3 to 6 units of these Intel Pentium G4560 units when they first hit NewEgg shelves for $65 USD. I have one for myself, but recommend these to friends and family all the time. I was hoping that Intel would continue the trend, but I suppose it was too much to ask.

FYI: There are two major areas where the G4560 chip loses to the i3-7100: (1) integrated graphics performance being nerfed and (2) lack of Intel Optane support for all non-core Intel chips. The Optane incompatibility is the major issue that I personally care about.

*Sebastian* Thank you for this update.

July 11, 2017 | 07:02 AM - Posted by Jabbadap

Maybe they will on next desktop platform. Top dog is rumored to be 6 core chip with 12 threads. So they might re-done their product segments... Plus the pressure from amd, now that they are on the game again.

July 14, 2017 | 04:38 AM - Posted by John H (not verified)

You can still use optane as a SSD. Just not a had accelerator..

July 11, 2017 | 07:25 AM - Posted by JohnGR

Nvidia is hurting Intel in the datacenter market.
AMD is bringing competition to the desktop and server market after many years
Intel's stock price was aiming at $45 for the last 3-4 years, but now it's moving downward towards $33.

Letting a G4560 destroy profit margins would make Intel shareholders start wondering if their investment is really as secured as it was looking 1-2 years ago. Intel is thinking it's shareholders here, not it's customers. Considering that it was selling the same hi end quad cores for the last 3-4 years, I wonder if they really think about their customers at all.

To be fair all companies do stupid things(from a customer's perspective) like this. Intel is just the last example.

July 11, 2017 | 11:10 AM - Posted by remc86007

We can all hope it will be the last example, but I fear it is just the latest example.

July 14, 2017 | 04:40 AM - Posted by John H (not verified)

Their shareholders would be impressed if they released processors that made their customers want to replace machines early but alas this is what the end of Moore's law looks like.

July 11, 2017 | 11:47 AM - Posted by CNote

Lol picked one up a month ago for a budget build, glad i got in on it. Great little gaming pc for cheap..

July 11, 2017 | 01:41 PM - Posted by agello24 (not verified)

its about damn time. only idiots gamed on them. you can multitask for shit with them.

July 12, 2017 | 03:08 PM - Posted by elites2012

its about damn time. only idiots gamed on them. you CAN'T multitask for shit with them.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote><p><br>
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.