Battle for encoding dominance

Subject: Processors | August 28, 2006 - 03:30 PM |

AMD has held the speed title for a while now, but with the introduction of Core2, the speed battles are much different.  LOSTCIRCUITS grabs a handful of the less expensive chips from Intel and AMD to see who can claim the fastest speed, and the most bang for the buck.

"Arguably, the biggest factor driving the computer industry is gaming. However, the home entertainment

sector, especially encoding of audiovisual content, is becoming increasingly important as well.

Ripping and editing software ranges from super-expensive studio editions to free downloads. Each

program has its own quirks, favoring either Intel's or AMD's processors. We took LAME, Dr. DiVX,

NeroVision4 and Monkey's Audio as representatives of the inexpensive (or free software) and ran AMD's

dual core CPUs as well as Intel's Core2 Duos through the paces. One issue to keep in mind is that not

all programs are multithreaded, this is particularly true for audio stream-encoding, however, multiple

cores can take care of multiple audio streams in parallel.

Processors we looked at run from about US$150.- to US$1150.- but is there also an 8 x performance

difference? In other words, which CPU will give the best bang for the money? "

Here are some more Processor articles from around the web:

Click Here to go to Processors  


No comments posted yet.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote><p><br>
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.