Latent performance

Subject: Memory | March 15, 2007 - 01:10 PM |

 Legion Hardware sets out to solve a mystery in this article about low latency RAM.  The cost difference between a lower latency DIMM and a higher can be enormous, so they test RAM at 5 different speeds and 4 different timings.  Can a high frequency overcome a low latency?

"Well there you have it, the results may be a little hard to swallow for those that shelled out big dollars for high speed

memory under the impression that is was actually faster. I have to admit, while I did not expect huge gains, I did expect

that on a 500MHz FSB DDR2-1181 memory would be faster! Strangely this just is not the case and as it turns out, low latency

memory is far more beneficial to Core 2 Duo owners. When you consider that a 1:1 ratio on a 500MHz FSB means the memory will

be operating at 1000MHz, it is hard to believe DDR2-667 has a chance, let alone believe it to be faster."

Here are some more Memory articles from around the web:

Click </p />
<p>Here to go to Memory


No comments posted yet.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote><p><br>
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.