Higher frequency or lower latency ... remember which is better?

Subject: Memory | February 3, 2011 - 12:04 PM |

OCIA recently revisited the old conundrum, is it better to buy or overclock the frequency of your DIMMs as high as possible, or to stick with the lowest latency possible?  It all comes down to the memory bandwidth, as these values are the variable which affect how many bits can flow through your RAM in a certain period of time.  To make it easier on those just starting to delve into this topic, OCIA's table of JEDEC
specifications will help you on your way to picking the best RAM

"As memory standards have changed over the years one thing has remained constant: the confusion that

arises when trying to compare different memory speeds and timings. It's been drilled into our heads

again and again that faster speed is good, but so are lower timings, and unfortunately those two ends

seem to move in opposite directions. The higher the memory goes in frequency, the greater number of

cycles spent waiting before reading from or writing to it. Invariably the question always arises, which

is better for my system?"

Here are some more Memory articles from around the web:

Click Here to go to Memory  Memory

Source: OCIA

No comments posted yet.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote><p><br>
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.