Revisting the GTX 980 Ti

Subject: Graphics Cards | June 17, 2015 - 06:24 PM |
Tagged: NVIDA, maxwell, GTX 980 Ti

Now that they have had time with the new NVIDIA card to test on games both familiar and new, [H]ard|OCP have put together a longer review of the GTX 980 Ti.  The Witcher 3 shows that for 4K gamers, the extra power of the TITAN does marginally beat out the newcomer.  Indeed that tended to hold true in many games, Dying Light and Far Cry 4 all saw the 980 Ti needing to lower graphical settings to remain at a decent frame rate but still remained a far better value for those gaming at 1440p.  They compare VRAM usage at 1440p versus 4K resolutions and it is obvious how much more memory is consumed as resolution increases.  Considering how none of the games tested used even half of the 12GB of VRAM on the TITAN it will be very interesting to see how AMD's new smaller sized but higher bandwidth HBM-based card will perform.

View Full Size

"Now that we have had some solid gaming time with the new NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti, we will be putting it up against the GTX 980 and TITAN X video cards, in the full HardOCP GPU review format. We are including new games, The Witcher 3 and Grand Theft Auto V. We also look at VRAM utilization and power and temperature levels."

Here are some more Graphics Card articles from around the web:

Graphics Cards

Source: [H]ard|OCP

Video News


June 17, 2015 | 07:23 PM - Posted by Heavy (not verified)

uhm i love pcper but this was a pointless articel i already knew most of what he pointed out.all this articel said is titanx does better at 4k gaming then 980 ti

June 17, 2015 | 07:31 PM - Posted by Anonymous (not verified)

Revisiting the 980TI so our Nvidia fans dont get upset more like it LOL

June 17, 2015 | 07:42 PM - Posted by Anonymous (not verified)

How dare you point out the obvious.

June 18, 2015 | 02:11 AM - Posted by Klimax (not verified)

Bit hard for anybody to get upset or something. There are not even reviews yet for Fury and co.

And leaked benches (if real, cannot ever discount fakeness) didn't show something extraordinary...

June 18, 2015 | 12:27 PM - Posted by Jeremy Hellstrom

No, no it's obviously not hard at all.
 

June 17, 2015 | 08:20 PM - Posted by Anonymous (not verified)

Gotta give NVIDIA some more headline space in the midst of all this AMD news.

June 18, 2015 | 02:56 AM - Posted by Edmond (not verified)

Ye, seriously... i thought pc per was better than this... guess not.

June 19, 2015 | 05:51 AM - Posted by Anonymous (not verified)

If you can not play UHD Bluray or HDR or Netflix 4K with NVIDIA 960/970/980
what HDCP 2.2 it is ?
what hdmi 2.0 it is ?
you can't have DCI - P3 coloer
NVIDIA data bandwidth 10.2 GB WHY NOT 18GBPS ?

all information is cut Above 10.2GBPS
so what HDMI 2.0 it is ? nvidia style ?
why nvidia no registers data bandwidth ? 8.75 ? 10.2 ?

June 22, 2015 | 01:36 PM - Posted by obababoy

Ill just put this here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f6qHW2Nrxlg

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote><p><br>
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.