AMD June Update: Catalyst monthly drops gone, higher clocked 7700, more free games

Subject: Graphics Cards | May 31, 2012 - 06:07 PM |
Tagged: dirt showdown, catalyst, amd, 7770, 7750

I just got off the phone with AMD this afternoon as they gave me a quick update on the status of Radeon PC gaming with some interesting news about the low-end HD 7700 cards and the world of Catalyst driver updates going into the future.

View Full Size

First up, there a few changes coming to gamers looking at cards in the Radeon HD 7770 series including higher base clocks, higher overclocking potential and the inclusion of a free copy of DiRT Showdown.  When the Cape Verde GPUs first launched in February the default clock speeds were 1.0 GHz on the HD 7770 and 800 MHz on the HD 7750.  Going ahead, the default clocks will be available to AICs at 1.1 GHz and 900 MHz, a 100 MHz clock speed jump for each.  

Along with these base clock increases you'll find that the Catalyst driver will allow you to push the clock speed up a bit higher as well.

Maybe more interesting than all that is many of the new SKUs will be including a free copy of the new DiRT Showdown, a value of $50 according to Steam today.  For a graphics card with a starting price of $109 or $129, a free copy of basically anything is a pretty sweet addition and should entice some people to make the move and upgrade from integrated graphics. 

View Full Size

After that good news came some more INTERESTING news about changes to AMD's driver organization going forward.  I have never been shy about sharing my disgust for some of the confusion that AMD's driver numbering systems, in-between and dual releases caused not only reviewers but the consumers we represent.  In an attempt to prevent this again AMD is moving away from the fixed cadence of a monthly Catalyst driver release and instead will move to a "dynamic" schedule.

Starting with driver release 12.6, Catalyst drivers will be released in an on-demand format and will be posted when there is a need for it either with significant performance increases or the release of a new game, etc.  You can see above that they are hoping to make sure that each Catalyst release will "deliver substantial benefit" to consumers as opposed to the monthly releases that might only offer minor changes. 

Here is where I think they are making a mistake: they are still going to be versioned as YEAR.MONTH so you'll see 12.8, 12.11, 13.3, etc types of versions.  But what if you release more than one a month?  Are we going to 12.85?  12.8.1?  If you are skipping the monthly cadence then WHY BOTHER with the "year.month" nomenclature?  Just increase the version in arbitrary amounts like we see with NVIDIA's drivers.  It just makes more sense.

Regardless, I am curious to see how much work AMD continues to put into their driver releases.  When I asked AMD is this meant they were scaling back on resources for the Catalyst team, I was assured that was NOT the case and in anything they were increasing staff in this area.  We'll see over time if AMD's new driver schedule (or lack thereof) benefits gamers.

Source: AMD

Video News

May 31, 2012 | 07:04 PM - Posted by icebug

I really hope that this changes to a more than one driver a month scenario instead of an every other month situation...

May 31, 2012 | 09:56 PM - Posted by terminal addict

Couldn't disagree more. I've never had an issue with knowing what version of driver I was dealing with. It was always easy to tell how old your driver was. Anyone with the ability to troubleshoot a game issue and research which driver to install shouldn't really struggle to the degree you describe. Honestly, I'm stunned you would describe your sentiment as "disgust".

I can't believe you would argue against a system that at least provides some referential detail for one that is, as you put it, completely arbitrary. How exactly does that "make sense"?

June 1, 2012 | 10:43 AM - Posted by Ryan Shrout

Over the last 12 months there have been many times where a driver release would be followed or preceded by a "beta" driver release and then an "RC" release, with the numbers out of order.

12.4 -> 12.5 Beta -> 12.6 RC1 -> 12.6 RC2 -> 12.5 Full

That's just an example, but the problem was always users weren't sure which was the "latest" and which fixed what games.

NVIDIA's numbering system makes it VERY easy to see what is the most recent.

June 1, 2012 | 04:26 AM - Posted by Anonymous (not verified)

i agree, while it was a tad annoying to have to keep up with a new driver each month, i frequently skipped a few months unless i had a new game that positively HAD to have the newest driver. Plus im not sure how the author has issues with the driver numbering. i mean, its pretty simple as far as im concerned. on an unrelated note....i REALLY REALLY want some longchamp luggage for some reason. well played internet spambot...well played.

June 1, 2012 | 11:15 AM - Posted by Anonymous (not verified)

I will never disagree with version numbers that make a little more sense.

June 2, 2012 | 01:05 PM - Posted by MrBlack

yep - when looking for a new clutch purse - I always check pcper first

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote><p><br>
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.