Is there a Hardline of difference between AMD and NVIDIA?
Subject: General Tech | February 11, 2015 - 01:44 PM | Jeremy Hellstrom
Tagged: gaming, ea, battlefield hardline
Battlefield Hardline is in public beta for those who have tired of Battlefield 4 and are looking for a new online Frostbite 3 shooter to play and [H]ard|OCP has run benchmarks to show you what kind of performance you can expect. They gathered together three cards from the two companies, a GTX 980, 970 and 960 as well as an R9 290X DD, 290 and 285 with a mix of default and factory overclocked frequencies. As of yet there is no Mantle support in the beta so both vendors are using DX11 in the tests, with the top four cards at 2560x1440 and the remaining two at 1080p, all set to 4X MSAA and Ultra settings except for the Dustbowl map. The GTX 980 takes top spot but the most interesting results are the 290X and 970; the difference is so minuscule that they essentially perform at the same level and the same can be said of the pricing. Also worthy of note is that in only one test did the cards use more than 3GB of RAM and never hit 3.5GB.
"We hopped on the open public beta of Battlefield Hardline this past week and tested performance in all three maps with six video cards to find out how this game performs. We will talk about each map in the beta, and our experiences in terms of performance and gameplay experience so that you will know what to expect in the full game."
Here is some more Tech News from around the web:
- A Beautiful Relic: 37 Mins of Homeworld Remastered @ Rock, Paper, SHOTGUN
- Atari reboots Asteroids as a sandbox survival PC game @ HEXUS
- Early Access Impressions: Darkest Dungeon @ Rock, Paper, SHOTGUN
- Wot I Think: Sunless Sea @ Rock, Paper, SHOTGUN
- Premature Evaluation: Besiege @ Rock, Paper, SHOTGUN
- Sid Knows Best: Poppa Meier Builds Starships @ Rock, Paper, SHOTGUN