Subject: General Tech | March 27, 2019 - 02:16 PM | Sebastian Peak
Tagged: uwp, portable, Microsoft Store, maxon, download, Cinebench R20, benchmark
MAXON has reversed course with the new Cinebench R20 benchmark, which is now available for standalone download directly from MAXON's website, no longer requiring the use of Microsoft's UWP platform. This author did his due diligence and has downloaded this new file, which is indeed a portable version in a ZIP file as we had been accustomed to with previous versions.
Cinebench R20, captured after running the portable download version from MAXON
Rather controversially, the new version of Cinebench was exclusive to the Microsoft Store when it was released, and Guru3D reported being threatened with legal action for hosting a standalone version for download on their site, which they took down at that time. With today's reversal the how-to guides on creating a portable version of the UWP app have, thankfully, become obsolete.
Subject: Memory | November 19, 2018 - 07:36 PM | Jeremy Hellstrom
Tagged: benchmark, aida64
AIDA64 just released what is likely to be the last update before AIDA64 and along with a number of new features, such as the detection of fake NVIDIA card, it can make your RGBs useful! A variety of RGBed SteelSeries, Coolermaster and Corsair can be used to display data visually, from CPU utilization, though network activity to temperatures and voltages.
It is also updated to properly display data onthe RX 580 and RX 590 as well as RTX and Quadro RTX Series cards. They've updated the AVX-512 accelerated benchmarks for Intel Cascade Lake and the Z390 chipset.
Subject: General Tech | September 18, 2018 - 01:07 PM | Jeremy Hellstrom
Tagged: RTX 2080 Ti, nvidia, leak, benchmark
A new leak has sprung from the green team, with a 2080 Ti purportedly showing up on some Final Fantasy XV benchmarks. The cards are in reviewers hands so it is possible someone slipped up on their NDA and these accurately depict performance, though this being the internet it is also likely someone is trolling. If true, the new card is almost 25% faster than the mighty Titan Xp, at least in a Final Fantasy XV benchmark. Unfortunately it will also cost more than a Titan Xp when it does finally arrive.
"At least that's according to results that popped up in a leaked database of Final Fantasy XV benchmarks, hat tip to TechRadar, in which the RTX 2080 Ti racked up a score of 5,897 compared to the 4,756 achieved by the Titan Xp."
Here is some more Tech News from around the web:
- Google Home Max @ The Inquirer
- Game streaming’s latency problems will be over in a few years, CEO says @ Ars Technica
- Amazon reportedly preparing to jump the shark with Alexa-powered microwave @ The Inquirer
- Top-5 notebook brands and top-3 ODMs see increases in August shipments @ Digitimes Research
- iOS 12, thoroughly reviewed @ Ars Technica
- ‘Vaporized’ electrons in graphene boost signals into the terahertz range @ Physics World
- Microsoft pulls plug on IPv6-only Wi-Fi network over borked VPN fears @ The Register
- Litter-Robot III Open Air @ The Tech Report
Subject: General Tech | August 10, 2018 - 11:17 PM | Scott Michaud
Tagged: Blender, benchmark
The Blender Foundation is wrapping up development on Blender 2.8, “The Workflow Update”. We have been following it for a while, but today’s announcement caught me by surprise: a benchmark database. It seems simple, right? Blender wants its users to know what hardware is best to use, especially when rendering images in Cycles (which can be damn slow).
A bit lopsided...
The solution is to make a version of Blender that creates and validates benchmarks, then compiles the data on their website. It’s still early days for this, with just 2052 entries (at the time of writing) and the majority of those were from Linux boxes. Also, they only break it down into a handful of categories: Fastest CPU, Fastest Compute Device, Submissions Per OS, then a few charts that compare the individual benchmark scenes against one another in a hardware-agnostic fashion. They pledge to add a lot of more metrics in the future.
Personally, I’m curious to see a performance vs OS metric. Some benchmarks back from 2016 (Blender 2.77 on an EVGA GTX 980 Ti) show Linux out-performing Windows 10 by over 2x, with Windows 7 landing in between (closer to Linux than Windows 10). At the time, it was attributed to NVIDIA’s CUDA driver being horribly optimized for the newer OS, which seems to be validated by the close showing of the GTX 1080 on Windows 10 and Linux, but I would like to see a compiled list of up-to-date results. I could soon be able to.
Subject: General Tech | June 21, 2018 - 03:46 PM | Jeremy Hellstrom
Tagged: basemark gpu, Basemark, benchmark
Basemark has been around for a while as a way to benchmark the performance of websites and relatively recently created a VR benchmark as well. Today they have expanded with a new tool specifically designed to help you benchmark your GPUs performance. The new Benchmark GPU tool will allow you to test the performance of Vulkan 1.0, OpenGL 4.5 or OpenGL ES 3.1 on Windows, Linux and Android with support for Metal and DirectX 12 as well as iOS devices coming soon. The tool is free to download and run, grab it from the links above or snag it from Google Play.
"Basemark launched today Basemark GPU, a new graphics performance evaluation tool for systems with Vulkan 1.0, OpenGL 4.5 or OpenGL ES 3.1 graphics APIs. This tool enables the industry to objectively and reliably quantify and compare graphics performance of next-generation mobile, automotive and desktop processors."
Here is some more Tech News from around the web:
- Facebook Will Harass You Mercilessly If You Try To Break Up @ Slashdot
- AMD's Threadripper 2990X takes on Intel's 28-core CPU in leaked benchmarks @ The Inquirer
- Are your IoT gizmos, music boxes, smart home kit vulnerable to DNS rebinding attacks? Here's how to check @ The Register
- A pretty and helpful user interface? Nahhh. Is that really you, Samsung? @ The Register
Subject: General Tech, Graphics Cards | February 27, 2017 - 03:39 PM | Jeremy Hellstrom
Tagged: MWC, GDC, VRMark, Servermark, OptoFidelity, cyan room, benchmark
Futuremark are showing off new benchmarks at GDC and MWC, the two conferences which are both happening this week. We will have quite a bit of coverage this week as we try to keep up with simultaneous news releases and presentations.
First up is a new benchmark in their recently released DX12 VRMark suite, the new Cyan Room which sits between the existing two in the suite. The Orange Room is to test if your system is capable of providing you with an acceptable VR experience or if your system falls somewhat short of the minimum requirements while the Blue Room is to show off what a system that exceeds the recommended specs can manage. The Cyan room will be for those who know that their system can handle most VR, and need to test their systems settings. If you don't have the test suite Humble Bundle has a great deal on this suite and several other tools, if you act quickly.
Next up is a new suite to test Google Daydream, Google Cardboard, and Samsung Gear VR performance and ability. There is more than just performance to test when you are using your phone to view VR content, such as avoiding setting your eyeholes on fire. The tests will help you determine just how long your device can run VR content before overheating becomes an issue and interferes with performance, as well as helping you determine your battery life.
VR Latency testing is the next in the list of announcements and is very important when it comes to VR as high or unstable latency is the reason some users need to add a bucket to their list of VR essentials. Futuremark have partnered with OptoFidelity to produce VR Multimeter HMD hardware based testing. This allows you, and hopefully soon PCPer as well, to test motion-to-photon latency, display persistence, and frame jitter as well as audio to video synchronization and motion-to-audio-latency all of which could lead to a bad time.
Last up is the brand new Servermark to test the performance you can expect out of virtual servers, media servers and other common tasks. The VDI test lets you determine if a virtual machine has been provisioned at a level commensurate to the assigned task, so you can adjust it as required. The Media Transcode portion lets you determine the maximum number of concurrent streams as well as the maximum quality of those streams which your server can handle, very nice for those hosting media for an audience.
Expect to hear more as we see the new benchmarks in action.
Subject: Processors | February 21, 2017 - 10:54 AM | Sebastian Peak
Tagged: ryzen, rumor, report, R7, processor, leak, IPC, cpu, Cinebench, benchmark, amd, 1700X
The Ryzen 7 1700X is reportedly an 8-core/16-thread processor with a base clock speed of 3.40 GHz, and while overall performance from the leaked benchmarks looks very impressive, it is the single-threaded score from the Cinebench R15 run pictured which really makes this CPU look like major competition for Intel with IPC.
An overall score of 1537 is outstanding, placing the CPU almost even with the i7-6900K at 1547 based on results from AnandTech:
Image credit AnandTech
And the single-threaded performance score of the reported Ryzen 7 1700X is 154, which places it above the i7-6900K's score of 153. (It is worth noting that Cinebench R15 shows a clock speed of 3.40 GHz for this CPU, which is the base, while CPU-Z is displaying 3.50 GHz - likely indicating a boost clock, which can reportedly surpass 3.80 GHz with this CPU.)
Other results from the reported leak include 3DMark Fire Strike, with a physics score of 17,916 with Ryzen 7 1700X clocking in at ~3.90 GHz:
We will know soon enough where this and other Ryzen processors stand relative to Intel's current offerings, and if Intel will respond to the (rumored) price/performance double whammy of Ryzen. An i7-6900K retails for $1099 and currently sells for $1049 on Newegg.com, and the rumored pricing (taken from Wccftech), if correct, gives AMD a big win here. Competition is very, very good!
Chart credit Wccftech.com
Subject: Processors | February 3, 2017 - 08:22 PM | Sebastian Peak
Tagged: titan x, ryzen, report, processor, nvidia, leak, cpu, benchmark, ashes of the singularity, amd
AMD's upcoming 8-core Ryzen CPU has appeared online in an apparent leak showing performance from an Ashes of the Singularity benchmark run. The benchmark results, available here on imgur and reported by TechPowerUp (among others today) shows the result of a run featuring the unreleased CPU paired with an NVIDIA Titan X graphics card.
It is interesting to consider that this rather unusual system configuration was also used by AMD during their New Horizon fan event in December, with an NVIDIA Titan X and Ryzen 8-core processor powering the 4K game demos of Battlefield 1 that were pitted against an Intel Core i7-6900K/Titan X combo.
It is also interesting to note that the processor listed in the screenshot above is (apparently) not an engineering sample, as TechPowerUp points out in their post:
"Unlike some previous benchmark leaks of Ryzen processors, which carried the prefix ES (Engineering Sample), this one carried the ZD Prefix, and the last characters on its string name are the most interesting to us: F4 stands for the silicon revision, while the 40_36 stands for the processor's Turbo and stock speeds respectively (4.0 GHz and 3.6 GHz)."
March is fast approaching, and we won't have to wait long to see just how powerful this new processor will be for 4K gaming (and other, less important stuff). For now, I want to find results from an AotS benchmark with a Titan X and i7-6900K to see how these numbers compare!
Subject: Graphics Cards | August 8, 2016 - 01:08 PM | Sebastian Peak
Tagged: amd, radeon, RX460, rx 460, graphics, gpu, gaming, benchmark, 1080p, 1920x1080, gtx 950, gtx 750 ti
HEXUS has posted their review of Sapphire's AMD Radeon RX 460 Nitro 4GB graphics card, pitting it against the NVIDIA GTX 950 and GTX 750 Ti in a 1920x1080 benchmarking battle.
Image credit: HEXUS
"Unlike the two previous AMD GPUs released under the Polaris branding recently, RX 460 is very much a mainstream part that's aimed at buyers who are taking their first real steps into PC gaming. RX 460 uses a distinct, smaller die and is to be priced from £99. As usual, let's fire up the comparison specification table and dissect the latest offering from AMD."
Image credit: HEXUS
The results might surprise you, and vary somewhat based on the game selected. Check out the source link for the full review over at HEXUS.
Subject: General Tech | March 15, 2016 - 05:32 PM | Sebastian Peak
Tagged: VRScore, VR, virtual reality, gdc 2016, GDC, crytek, CRYENGINE, benchmark, Basemark
Basemark has announced VRScore, a new benchmarking tool for VR produced in partnership with Crytek. The benchmark uses Crytek’s CRYENGINE along with the Basemark framework, and can be run with or without a head-mounted display (HMD).
"With VRScore, consumers and companies are able to reliably test their PC for VR readiness with various head mounted displays (HMDs). Unlike existing tools developed by hardware vendors themselves, VRScore has been developed independently to be an essential source of unbiased information for anyone interested in VR."
An independent solution is certainly welcome as we enter what promises to be the year of VR, and Basemark is well known for providing objective benchmark results with applications such as Basemark X and OS II, cross-platform benchmarks for mobile devices. The VRScore benchmark supports the Oculus Rift, HTC Vive, and Razer's OSVR headsets, and the corporate versions include VRTrek, a left/right eye latency measurement device.
Here’s the list of features from Basemark:
- Supports HTC Vive, Oculus Rift and OSVR
- Uses CRYENGINE
- Supports both DirectX 12 and DirectX 11
- Features Codename: Sky Harbor, an original IP game scene by Crytek
- Includes tests for interactive VR (VR game), non-interactive VR (360 VR video) and VR spatial audio (360 sound)
- Can be used with or without an HMD
- Power Board, an integrated online service, gives personalized PC upgrading advice and features performance ranking lists for HMDs, CPUs and GPUs
- Corporate versions include VRTrek, a patent pending latency testing device with dual phototransistors for application to photon latency, display persistence, left and right eye latency, dropped frames and duplicated frames testing
VRScore Trek eye latency measurement device, included with corporate version
VRScore is currently available only to corporate customers via the company’s early access program and Benchmark Development Program. The consumer versions (free and paid) will be released in June.