Subject: Processors | December 18, 2006 - 12:36 AM | Ryan Shrout
The gang at Anandtech has published their tests looking at the new Opteron Socket-F processors and the new Xeon processors from Intel as well.
Some might wonder if a different - read Intel - motherboard for the Woodcrest system could have significantly altered the outcome of these tests. We do not think so. Although the Intel motherboards do tend to show slightly lower power consumption, it is not a significant difference.
Subject: Processors | December 16, 2006 - 11:17 PM | Ryan Shrout
While the 65nm processors from AMD should soon be hitting the streets for everyone to buy, Anandtech got a set of them a bit early and put them to the test to see if power/performance was improved.
Overall we're left with mixed feelings after playing with AMD's first 65nm chips. Power consumption is definitely reduced compared to its 90nm offerings; in our tests we saw an average reduction in total system power consumption of 14.6W thanks to the new Brisbane core.
Subject: Processors | December 16, 2006 - 11:14 PM | Ryan Shrout
The tech wizards at The Tech Report have compiled a review comparing the latest in Intel's server/workstation line to the Socket-F AMD Opteron processors released earlier in the year. They do a fantastic job looking at the power and performance of almost exactly configured systems and this article is definitely worth a read!
You might also want to see what the Tech Report found out about AMD's upcoming processor
Subject: Processors | December 12, 2006 - 11:31 AM | Jeremy Hellstrom
San Francisco, CA. -Dec. 12, 2006- At the International Electron Device
Meeting (IEDM) today, IBM (NYSE: IBM) and AMD (NYSE: AMD) presented
papers describing the use of immersion lithography, ultra-low-K
interconnect dielectrics, and multiple enhanced transistor strain
techniques for application to the 45nm microprocessor process
Subject: Processors | December 6, 2006 - 12:11 PM | Jeremy Hellstrom
The Tech Report has linked to a couple of articles on the upcoming shift to 32nm, which comes hot on the heels of AMD's move to 65nm and Intel's upcoming 45nm process. Electric companies won't be impressed, as this will lower the power requirements of quad core systems considerably.
Subject: Processors | December 5, 2006 - 11:29 AM | Jeremy Hellstrom
SUNNYVALE, CALIF. - Dec. 5, 2006 - Launching the next generation
of energy-efficient computing, AMD (NYSE: AMD) today announced the
transition to 65nm process technology, beginning with the immediate
availability of energy-efficient AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 dual-core desktop
processors. The move to 65nm process technology enables AMD to produce
more processors on a 300mm wafer, for increased production capacity,
while continuing to aggressively scale performance and reduce power
Subject: Processors | November 30, 2006 - 04:24 PM | Jeremy Hellstrom
BERKELEY, CALIF. - Nov. 30, 2006 -- AMD (NYSE: AMD) today demonstrated
the industry's first native quad-core x86 server processor, achieving
four x86 processing cores on a single die of silicon. At the annual AMD
Industry Analyst Forum, a server powered by four upcoming Quad-Core AMD
Opteron(tm) processors (codenamed Barcelona), manufactured on 65nm
silicon-on-insulator process technology, was shown utilizing all 16
Subject: Processors | November 30, 2006 - 12:53 PM | Jeremy Hellstrom
Stop by [H]ard|OCP for a look at AMD's dual socket, dual core system. Each retail package comes with a pair of socket 1207 Opterons, and everyone is benchmarking them to find out if it can put some heat back onto Intel. You can see Ryan's take at the top of our front page.
Subject: Processors | November 30, 2006 - 12:15 PM | Jeremy Hellstrom
SUNNYVALE, CALIF. - Nov. 30, 2006 - Charting another industry first
for computing enthusiasts, AMD (NYSE: AMD) today announced the AMD Quad FX
Platform with Dual Socket Direct Connect (DSDC) Architecture, the first
dual-socket, multi-core desktop PC platform designed to take advantage of
the latest enhancements in WindowsÂ® Vista(tm) Ultimate.
Taking the Hype in Stride
AMD is launching their much-hyped "4x4 quad-father" platform today known as Quad FX. Can their sewn-together quad-corep processing initiative work or will with the power consumption and performance compared to Intel's QX6700 put it 6ft under?