Even more monitors

Subject: Displays | September 10, 2007 - 11:40 AM |
Tagged:

X-Bit Labs is on a roll. In their latst batch of monitor reviews, number 4 in a long series, they compare 20" 13 LCD monitors, covering widescreen and regular sized, cheap entry level and the more expensive side.  You can see just how important Response Time Compensation is, and differences between VA, TN, S-IPS and the other matrices that LCDs are built with now.

Source: X-Bit Labs

Easy on the eyes, and on the back

Subject: Displays | August 24, 2007 - 11:50 AM |
Tagged:

Sharp has been showing off a 52" LCD display that only weighs 60lb.  You won't be able to learn much more about it on Sharp's webpage, but you can drool over the pictures on [H]ard|OCP.

Source: [H]ard|OCP

When your response rate isn't your response rate

Subject: Displays | August 13, 2007 - 02:00 PM |
Tagged:

22" screens sit at about the $300 price mark, and tend not to have some of the features you see on higher end LCDs, like response time compensation.  This tends to mean that the published response rate tends to be much lower than what you will actually experience, even to the point of ghosting in games and action movies.  X-bit Labs has done some homework on this size of monitor, and give a complete break down on seven TN matrix monitors and their various strengths and weaknesses.

"This roundup is all

Source: X-Bit Labs

Putting form too far before function

Subject: Displays | August 2, 2007 - 10:45 AM |
Tagged:

The HP w2207 is a 22" monitor with a native 1680x1050 resolution and HDCP compatible DVI connections as well as VGA.  AnandTech found that the extra money this monitor costs has been put into the construction of the frame and stand, which are well constructed, and offer a better range of angles than most cheaper 22" LCDs.  Unfortunately, the review went downhill from there.

Source: AnandTech

Getting the right size

Subject: Displays | July 27, 2007 - 11:28 AM |
Tagged:

The Planar PX2611W offers an 26" alternative to the huge 30" widescreens for those with smaller desks, or pocketbooks.  Benchmark Reviews found this 1920 x 1200 wide gamut monitor to be perfect for gaming.  You can find out just how good it is by reading the full review.

Getting what you paid for

Subject: Displays | July 9, 2007 - 10:59 AM |
Tagged:

Samsung's 226BW is a very cheap 22" monitor, and a very nice one ...

Source: BCCHardware

The V7 group puts on a good display

Subject: Displays | June 27, 2007 - 12:00 PM |
Tagged:

The V7 group has put out a very attractively priced 22" widescreen LCD, the D22W12.  A 1680x1050 monitor with a 5ms response rate and a 700:1 contrast ratio, they certainly didn't skimp on the quality, and they even included integral speakers. Motherboards.org was so impressed, they gave it their Hot Product Award.

Look UltraSharp thanks to Dell

Subject: Displays | June 13, 2007 - 01:13 PM |
Tagged:

The Tech Lounge has posted a review of a well featured 27" monitor from Dell, the UltraSharp 2707WFP.  Fairly expensive when compared to it's smaller brother, the 2407WP, it offers the same resolution and 20% more screen real estate.  It's back is packed with all the input connections you would expect as well as a four USB 2.0 ports.  The HD quality and response times make this mo

22" display for under $400?

Subject: Displays | May 28, 2007 - 11:22 AM |
Tagged:

XYZ Computers pick up the 'elegantly styled' Viewsonic VX2235WM 22" LCD.  With 5ms response and a maximum resolution of 1680x1050 it has the stats for a good gaming monitor, and the included speaker will help those missing a good sound system.  However they found the layout of the screen to be a bit odd, almost bottom heavy, and there were some problems with a sticker. 

Is a generic brand LCD worth the investment?

Subject: Displays | May 17, 2007 - 11:21 AM |
Tagged:

At first glance, a 19" widescreen LCD with 8ms response time, 285 mm pixel pitch and 1440 x 900 max resolution for $170 sounds like a great deal.  Investigating a bit deeper, you start to notice things like a total lack of a native resolution, a base without a height adjustment and poor built in speakers.  Big Bruin was impressed overall, the image quality was very good for an LCD without a DVI input and the price really can't be beat.

Source: Big Bruin