Review Index:
Feedback

AMD Phenom versus Athlon X2: Something Old, Something New...

Author: Josh Walrath
Subject: Processors
Manufacturer: AMD
Tagged:

Setup, SiSoft Sandra and 3DMarks

The Setup

I used three processors in my testing; the Athlon X2 5000+ (2.6 GHz 65 nm dual core), the Phenom 9600 Black Edition (2.3 GHz 65 nm quad core), and the Phenom 9900 (2.6 GHz 65 nm quad core- unreleased).  I thought it would be an interesting comparison to see the Phenom vs. the Athlon X2 at both the same clockspeed (2.6 GHz), and with the Phenom 300 MHz slower (2.3 GHz).  This should give us a pretty good idea how much performance AMD added to the Phenom in its quad core capacity.

The rest of the system utilized the Asus M3A32-MVP Deluxe motherboard, 8800 GTX video card, 2 GB of Corsair DDR-2 1066 memory, and a 320 GB Seagate HD.  The system was set up running Microsoft Vista 64 Ultimate pre-SP1.  I utilized the ThermalTake 600 Watt PurePower to get the system chugging along.

SiSoft Sandra XI

Being a synthetic benchmark, we should see some pretty significant differences between the old and the new, especially considering quad cores vs. dual.


For being 300 MHz slower, the Phenom 9600 sure takes the older X2 5000+ to town.  Of particular interest is the memory controller which is putting out some fantastic numbers in terms of bandwidth.  The redone SSE unit also pays off big dividends in both integer and float SSE functions.

3D Mark 2005

Though set for retirement soon from our stable of benchmarks, 2005 still posts some significant numbers in terms of differentiating products.


The numbers are certainly eye-opening.  Even when the Phenom 2.3 GHz is 300 MHz slower than the X2, it simply destroys it when it comes to performance.  3D 2005 is not as multi-threaded happy as later versions, but the differences are pretty astounding.  Looking at the Phenom 2.6 GHz, the performance difference becomes even greater.

3D Mark 2006

The second latest iteration of 3D Mark is much more multi-threaded aware, and can take better advantage of multiple cores.  The differences should be even more pronounced.

4 cores are greater than 2.  Not exactly rocket science there.  The CPU tests show the largest advances when going from X2 to Phenom, but even in the more GPU bound tests the Phenom still significantly outperforms the X2.

No comments posted yet.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote><p><br>
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.