AMD FX-8350 and FX-6300 Processor Review: Vishera Breaks Cover
Results: SiSoft Sandra 2012 SP5c
The very latest version of SiSoft Sandra supports AVX and FMA3/FMA4 instructions. This gives us a relatively good idea where performance should shake out in the majority of our tests, or at least where it SHOULD shake out if these programs adequately identify all of the features present.
For some odd reason Dhrystone was always lower on the 8350 as compared to the 8150. The i7 cleans house in synthetics, except when it came to the MMX Integer performance. The 8350’s dual 128 bit unit can, in this instance, do more operations than the single 256 bit unit on the i7. It is nice to see AMD getting some good performance out of their memory controllers, and Vishera improves upon Zambezi by a small amount. These modern processors all make the X6 1100T look lethargic when it comes to memory bandwidth.
PC Perspective Upcoming Events
|
" While Zambezi was not exactly stillborn, it was more than a tad under-cooked" Haha, oh Josh, I love your analogies.
Overall it was as expected, which is a shame because I never expected much from this. I don't think it's a big enough improvement for me to switch up from my zambezi but may pull some new people in with that price point.. Afterall, it's what AMD need if they want to have a financially viable business.
"Copious amounts of dust helps to simulate real world conditions."
LOL Josh is the best hardware reviewest on the interwebz.
No Cinebench R11.59 single core results? Move my 1100T up to 4 ghz just like the FX-8350 and it beats it in most situations easily. It's been two years and AMD can't even supply me with a worthy upgrade. Another year...... another dud.... sigh
Move that 8350 up to 4.4 or 4.6 and then take another look. Can't overclock one without the other. Add in some NB/L3 overclocking and the processor really perks up. Remember, these results were all stock clocks.
Their lack of performance gains is frustrating. Not trying to put a downer on your article but I've been AMD for a long time now and I'm tired of making excuses for them.... aren't you?
I think my conclusion holds up well. This is essentially a part that should have been released last year. Only now do they have a competent next gen part that competes with what Intel has at that price range. I do miss the days of competition where AMD had the original K7 and K8. So, they have a good part that has finally reached market and will attract some buyers. It doesn't beat up the competition in any meaningful way, but it is a good step forward for the company. Hopefully Steamroller continues this trend.
With the money trouble that their in, Piledriver is not going to be the shot in the arm that they need. AMD could go away by Steamroller's arrival.
Well, their financial situation is much more stable now and they actually have some money in the bank. They will get through Steamroller, but beyond that is a big crap shoot. While their ex-CFO did leave them in good financial shape, we have to wonder how much he undermined the foundation of the company with his policies.
Not to argue your point but AMD just announced quarter 3 results of a $157 million loss and well as hundreds of layoffs for employees planned. I wouldn't exactly call anything about that as "stable".
Well, they consolidated debt, built up cash reserves, and paid down a lot of stuff all the while renegotiating contracts to be less financially binding. They are in a better overall shape now then they have in years, and while this past quarter was a big negative... they are still ahead of where they were 2 years ago by a long shot.
1100T's limit is 4Ghz
8350's limit is 4.9-5Ghz
Let's compare them now.
And a 1100T at 4Ghz doesn't win in all scenarios against a 8350 a 4Ghz.
That's some fast "DDR-2" on the test page : P
Must have cost you an arm and a leg.
Haha, you should see the hammer I had to use to get those damn DDR-2 modules to fit into the motherboard I used!
Thanks for the head's up... fixed.
Lets see how it does at 5GHZ and nice NB speed....
I'm requesting one of their LCS and will attempt to get there.
Perfect timing, i'm building a new rig and getting ready to purchase the mobo and CPU next month. I've been using AMD CPUs since 1994. I'll probably go with the 6300 and then upgrade further when they get around to releasing a new chipset, I also prefer sticking with the lower wattage parts.
Great Article as always Josh!
Finally!
Its refreshing to see AMD with a competing part.
Unless i was reading wrong, it looks like they finally surpassed the X6. About damn time, way to go.
Geeze that i7 is freakin fast though.
Although it would be nice to see this vs an i5 to get a better idea of performance.
I am really happy for AMD.
Next CPU better have the 3.0s on the Mobo though. I want to see comparisons of Intels USB 3.0 and PCIE 3.0 vs AMDs
I am finally starting to understand where AMD is going with this architecture. I am really looking forward to seeing where they will go with this later on down the road.
It's funny because i always want AMD to make some big comeback, we need to keep that competition stiff with Intel so they don't get lazy.
I was thinking in my head - this FX6300 is priced low and games fine, maybe i'll try it in my next build.
Then i remembered i5-2500k is only $159.99 @ microcenter....why the heck would i even use an FX6300? The i5-2500k will still be faster, overclock higher, and do all of this while using less power and putting out less heat.
Cmon AMD!!! Step it up!
the i5 2500k doesn't cost 159$
stop lying.
I'm going on my 8th gaming rig and I'm sticking with AMD. Intel cpu's dont't hold up as good is AMD. With out over clocking i had a FX 6200 walk all over a Intel I7 2700k. and then replaced it with my friends I7 3770k and no diffrents at all. same boards, same ram, same SSD size and brand. Even same MSI GTX 580 video card. So don't beleave every thing you read. Most people are not testing cpu's right OR they are being pay to talk down AMD. I have been working on computers long enuff to know whats up.
What a crock of shit! walk all over a 2700k! Blah Blah Blah.
there only just keeping up with the i5, are they not!. Would you be on you 8th gaming rig this year cos you keep blowing them up as you don`t have a clue what your doing?
Superb website you have here but I was wanting to know if you
knew of any discussion boards that cover the same topics talked about in this article?
I'd really love to be a part of group where I can get responses from other knowledgeable people that share the same interest. If you have any suggestions, please let me know. Thank you!
Feel free to surf to my web site ... Darnell
FX 6300 "walk all over" a 2700k!!?? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA\\
KOoL sToRy BrO!!!!!
I especially like the part where you swapped out AMD processors and Intel Processors "Using all the same motherboard and Ram"....Which is impossible
Time to get real here
Josh, did you bench at min rez for comparison? I would like to see it vs an i7 would be cool.
Could there be multi gpu tests in a seperate review, with hd 7870 and 7970, maybe even 7770 series performance level cards? To see at what point FX Vishera crossfire or sli is adequate. Games with old and new engines could be differentiated...
Might take a while to do it (to-do list is rather long these days), but I think this would be an interesting aspect to test.
Let's see an Interlagos 16-core version of this part. AMD is behind at single-threaded performance so they should emphasize their strength which is multiprocessing.
Also let's see a dual-CPU capable version of Vishera, and some cheap desktop motherboards with dual sockets. Multi-threading is here to stay.
Cheap dual socket opteron boards are not available. Our best price for dual socket is about $500-$600. Single socket 16 core may be interesting in some tests though.
How much is it going to cost me to stick 16 cores worth of piledriver on one motherboard?
Please if possible do another round of benchmarking with the 8350 at 4.8GHz, and the 1100T at 4GHz
Almost every review I have seen so far, shows the 8350 hitting 4.8GHz before the heat overpowers what most heatsinks can handle.
The average overclock for the 1100T is 4GHz (though some users are able to hit 4.4GHz on liquid cooling)
anyway, most of the people who are reading this article are most likely overclocking their CPU. If I build my own system targeted at performance, I am going to overclock.
The newer FX chips run at a significantly higher clock speed and even at those high clock speeds, struggles to beat the 3.3GHz 1100t.
For the users overclocking their Phenom II x6's to 4GHz, how viable will the 8350 be when overclocked to 4.8GHz as compared to the 1100t?
Remember, the Phenom II has a higher IPC so a 700MHz overclock will do a lot more for it than an extra 800MHz will do for the 8350.
Post new comment