Review Index:
Feedback

The Dell XPS 13 Notebook Review - Broadwell and Battery Life

Author:
Subject: Mobile
Manufacturer: Dell

Specifications

The perfect laptop; it is every manufacturer’s goal. Obviously no one has gotten there yet (or we would have all stopped writing reviews of them). At CES this past January, we got our first glimpse of a new flagship Ultrabook from Dell: the XPS 13. It got immediate attention for some of the physical characteristics it included, like an ultra-thin bezel and a 13-in screen in the body of a typical 11-in laptop, all while being built in a sleek thin and light design. It’s not a gaming machine, despite what you might remember from the XPS line, but the Intel Core-series Broadwell-U processor keeps performance speedy in standard computing tasks.

View Full Size

As a frequent traveler that tends to err on the side of thin and light designs, as opposed to high performance notebooks with discrete graphics, the Dell XPS 13 is immediately compelling on a personal level as well. I have long been known as a fan of what Lenovo builds for this space, trusting my work machine requirements to the ThinkPad line for years and year. Dell’s new XPS 13 is a strong contender to take away that top spot for me and perhaps force me down the path of an upgrade of my own. So, you might consider this review as my personal thesis on the viability of said change.

The Dell XPS 13 Specifications

First, make sure as you hunt around the web for information on the XPS 13 that you are focusing on the new 2015 model. Much like we see from Apple, Dell reuses model names and that can cause confusion unless you know what specifications to look for or exactly what sub-model you need. Trust me, the new XPS 13 is much better than anything that existed before.

Continue reading our review of the Dell XPS 13 Notebook!

Also, there are two different primary configurations of the XPS 13 that offer very different bases. The one that got all of the attention at CES was the more expensive model that includes a Quad HD+ screen with a 3200x1800 resolution, high gloss touch screen. There is no denying that it gives an incredible first impression but it adds weight (0.2 lbs.) and takes away dramatically from battery life. Anandtech previously tested both models and showed as much as 6 hours (!!) during idle usage, thanks to the additional pixels adding workload to the integrated GPU on the Broadwell processor.

View Full Size

Instead, I requested the model that I think is genuinely more compelling from Dell. Starting at just $899, you can grab a Dell XPS 13 with a 1920x1080, matte, non-touch screen with 4GB of memory and 128GB SSD. You can actually pick it up for as little as $799 if you sacrifice the Core i5-5200U for the Core i3-5010U that runs 600 MHz slower at Turbo clock.

  Dell XPS 13 (9343)
Processor Intel Core i5-5200U (Broadwell)
Graphics Intel HD Graphics 5500
Memory 4GB DDR3-1600
Screen 13.3-in 1920x1080 IPS
Storage 128GB Samsung PM851
Camera 720p Widescreen (dual microphones)
Audio 2 watts (total) Stereo Speakers
Wireless Intel 7265 802.11ac + BT 4.0 (Dual Band, 2x2)
Connection 2 x USB 3.0
SD Card Slot
Mini DisplayPort
Headphone/Mic Jack
Kensington Lock
Battery 52 Whr
Dimensions 304mm x 200 mm x 9-15mm (11.98" x 7.88" x 0.33-0.6")
2.6 lbs. (1.18 kg)
OS Windows 8.1
Price $899 - Amazon.com

If you separate the display specifications out from the rest, the two models of the XPS 13 are identical in hardware configurations. You can only get the Core i7 version of the Broadwell-U processor or the 512GB SSD in the high-resolution screen model, but otherwise you get nearly identical laptops.

Intel’s new Broadwell-U based Core i5-5200U is the next-generation replacement for the Ultrabook line of notebooks, taking over the spot dominated by the Core i5-4250U for the past 12-18 months. Graphics performance is improved more than CPU performance with the Intel HD Graphics HD 5500 that can peak at up to 950 MHz. If you are interested in our initial performance comparison results of Broadwell-U and previous generation Intel mobile processors from the Gigabyte BRIX S last month that uses the exact same processor model.

I will talk more about the display on the next pages, but there are significant specification differences between the two options that Dell offers. Both are the same physical size at 13.3 inches diagonal, but the higher end option includes a 3200x1800 resolution touch screen that is a high gloss finish. The lower cost option is 1920x1080, does not include a touch screen and has a matte finish. It’s lighter, too. If you go with the QHD+ option you are definitely going to need to enable scaling in Windows and in fact, everyone in the office agreed you should enable 125% scaling even with the 1080p option. I always prefer the matte finish versus glossy screens for working outdoors or even near a window on a flight or at a coffee shop.

View Full Size

System memory options are 4GB or 8GB. I think it’s reasonable to suggest that all buyers should attempt to buy that 8GB option if possible, to improve performance today and into the future. Solid state storage is the only option and will ship with 128GB, 256GB and 512GB configurations.

Wireless connectivity is supplied by a dual-band 2x2 802.11ac radio and Bluetooth 4.0 though there are different controller options that Dell has before them. It doesn’t appear the user gets to really select which hardware is used, but both the Dell Wireless 1560 and the Intel 7265 are available, offering the same connectivity options and support for Miracast and Intel Smart Connect.

View Full Size

The battery is not user replaceable but packs a punch at 52 Whr, giving the XPS 13 a lot of legs for extended battery life. Our battery testing proves that’s the case; Dell has bragging rights for sure.

Weighing in at just 2.6 lbs. for the non-touch model and 2.8 lbs. for the 3200x1800 touch screen configuration, the Dell XPS 13 is incredibly portable and will fit into nearly any back briefcase or backpack without taking much room. Despite housing a 13.3-in screen the XPS 13 only measures 11.98-in wide, 7.88-in deep and 0.6-in think (at its highest).


March 25, 2015 | 03:30 PM - Posted by Hashim K Barem (not verified)

Can you please review the ASUS Zenbook UX305FA-ASM1 ?

March 25, 2015 | 03:30 PM - Posted by hashimstar

Can you please review the ASUS Zenbook UX305FA-ASM1 ?

March 25, 2015 | 04:04 PM - Posted by Sandineyes (not verified)

I was pretty excited hearing about this laptop with the 1080p screen option, being that I tried out a Yoga 3 Pro and ended up returning it due to the (in my opinion) poor battery life, limited performance, and a display with a lot of caveats. In my opinion, you'd have to really be set on OSX to get a Macbook Air over this.

However, there is also the HP Spectre x360, which is priced a bit better than this considering it is a convertible and has a touchscreen.

March 25, 2015 | 04:21 PM - Posted by Anonymous (not verified)

"Everyone wants to build the perfect laptop but that is nearly an impossible task given the range of preferences from consumers." Ain't that the truth. Though, this laptop seems more like bait: beauty over utility. (aka, YES, the screen is undeniably gorgeous)

I'm in the market for a new laptop but this one seems to fall short for me. If the laptop isn't going to be upgradable (please check me on this), I'd like to see higher options for things like ram and storage. That 8GB cap kills me. Of course, all of this is nonsense if it isn't soldered in and I can upgrade it myself to a 16GB kit. (right now, deal breaker)

Also, I'm not a fan of bottom facing exhaust ports. Usually, that means that the laptop will overheat if used on any surface other than a desk. An example would be trying to watch movies in bed. The covers will block those ports and trouble will follow. (not a deal breaker though)

Finally, since Dell has garnered a negative reputation with me in the past, I'm not willing to take a chance on them if I have to settle on specifications I normally wouldn't settle for with companies that have earned my 'trust' or expectation for quality and longevity.

March 25, 2015 | 05:29 PM - Posted by Anonymous (not verified)

Shyan Rout.

March 26, 2015 | 01:42 AM - Posted by Humanitarian

Please don't start putting rhetorical questions on the video thumbnails.

March 26, 2015 | 03:17 AM - Posted by Anonymous (not verified)

This drives me crazy. Such a desirable laptop, but there are again issues with the trackpad and drivers. If I spend $1100-1200 on a 8gb/256gb configuration, I want the all the trackpad's features to work, such as two finger scrolling.

I bought the first generation Asus Zenbook, and they completely whiffed on the trackpad implementation. I don't want to have to bring another mouse; just make the darn trackpad work!

March 26, 2015 | 06:32 PM - Posted by Anonymous (not verified)

The delay in two-finger scrolling can be changed in the settings. It's automatically set to delay to prevent your palm activated the touch pad while typing.

March 26, 2015 | 07:00 PM - Posted by Anonymous (not verified)

I got this laptop last week. Coming from a 13 inch retina MacBook Pro I can confidently say that I am enjoying this more than the latter. The QHD touchscreen is a delight. Surprisingly the shut down time is quicker and the build quality is just so beautiful. I have a fetish with carbon fiber you know. But I have one issue: my unit did not come with the wall adapter that attaches to the main power brick. Where could I possibly buy it?

March 27, 2015 | 12:33 AM - Posted by StephanS

I'm set on getting this model, thanks for the review.

But its true that perfection is hard to achieve.

For me, its would be a merge between the asus X305 & this XPS.

Asus x305 with the higher end core M, thin bezel screen, back lit keyboard. No problem paying a $200 premium for that.

I will pay the $200 premium with the XPS. But you get half the ram, half the storage, fan cooling in a non aluminium 'unibody' shell.

But the i5-5200u with a 2ghz base clock vs 800mhz make all the goodies of the x305 vanish... og if only it had a M-5Y71...

March 28, 2015 | 02:32 PM - Posted by Saul Good (not verified)

Any chance you have a Samsu​ng SM95​1 or SM941 lying around to test with the XPS 13?

I keep getting conflicting data about whether or not PCIe is supported on the M.2 slot (or if it requires a BIOS update or if it is physically incompatible, which seems unlikely). At least one person has reported it works, and another that it doesn't.

I went with the i3 version and I'm hoping a SM951 will fix my only two complaints: 4GB of RAM is not enough and neither is 128 GB of storage. Otherwise, it's fantastic.

May 15, 2015 | 04:58 AM - Posted by Anonymous (not verified)

I can confirm that the SM951 works just fine with a 2015 XPS 13.

May 1, 2015 | 04:03 AM - Posted by nevzim (not verified)

Lenovo's Yoga 3 Pro is actually 53% slower than the Dell XPS 13 with its lower power processor design and in applications where multi-threaded performance comes into play ...

To me 53% slower means 47% of the performance which is not the case.

June 6, 2015 | 11:31 AM - Posted by JOelFernandes (not verified)

Anyone overcome the scrolling issue? I see severe degradation in battery life using chrome , its fine with IE . please advise if you have found solution , I believe the latest firmware upgrade from dell 04 messes the battery life and doesn't fix the touchpad scroll issue ...

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote><p><br>
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.