Review Index:

Borderlands 2 PhysX Performance and PhysX Comparison - GTX 680 and HD 7970

Manufacturer: Various

PhysX Settings Comparison

Borderlands 2 is a hell of a game; we actually ran a 4+ hour live event on launch day to celebrate its release and played it after our podcast that week as well.  When big PC releases occur we usually like to take a look at performance of the game on a few graphics cards as well to see how NVIDIA and AMD cards stack up.  Interestingly, for this title, PhysX technology was brought up again and NVIDIA was widely pushing it as a great example of implementation of the GPU-accelerated physics engine.

What you may find unique in Borderlands 2 is that the game actually allows you to enabled PhysX features at Low, Medium and High settings, with either NVIDIA or AMD Radeon graphics cards installed in your system.  In past titles, like Batman: Arkham City and Mafia II, PhysX was only able to be enabled (or at least at higher settings) if you had an NVIDIA card.  Many gamers that used AMD cards saw this as a slight and we tended to agree.  But since we could enable it with a Radeon card installed, we were curious to see what the results would be.

View Full Size

Of course, don't expect the PhysX effects to be able to utilize the Radeon GPU for acceleration...

Borderlands 2 PhysX Settings Comparison

The first thing we wanted to learn was just how much difference you would see by moving from Low (the lowest setting, there is no "off") to Medium and then to High.  The effects were identical on both AMD and NVIDIA cards and we made a short video here to demonstrate the changes in settings.

Continue reading our article that compares PhysX settings on AMD and NVIDIA GPUs!!

One thing you may not right away - we are using an upcoming benchmark scene that was developed by Gearbox and sent to us by NVIDIA.  I know, I know, some of you are going to complain about using a benchmark provided by NVIDIA, but I understand that this will soon find its way into the main game via an upcoming patch so I feel comfortable utilizing it now.  The automatic run through uses real-time game engine code, AI implementation and effects of gun fire, exploding barrels and more, just as we saw in our 4 hours and more of game time.

Another interesting note is that this early version of the benchmark has two additional scenes when PhysX is set to the High preset - a bug according to our contacts at NVIDIA.  Annoying, but not that big of a deal since it occurred on both AMD and NVIDIA based configurations.

View Full Size

From the video above you can see that the difference in game play from having PhysX at Low and Medium is pretty substantial - there are particles that come up from the ground when you shoot it, fluids that come out of exploding barrels, etc.  The changes in moving from Medium to High are quite a bit more subtle and include additional fluid interactions and more particles in general. 

Initially, NVIDIA told us that the PhysX settings were utilizing the CPU when a non-NVIDIA graphics card was installed, but as we looked at our results (on the next page) that doesn't actually appear to be the case. 

Testing Setup and Configuration

For our quick testing today we were just going to run one AMD card and one NVIDIA card.  In this case we used the Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition 3GB card and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 2GB - the top single GPU options from each vendor.  Driver versions were 12.8 and 306.23 respectively. 

View Full Size

Using FRAPS we recorded 80 seconds (almost all) of the benchmark map to get our average, minimum and maximum frame rates as well as our frame rates over time.  Because we expected PhysX to use some additional CPU horsepower on the AMD card than the NVIDIA card, we used the Windows Performance Monitor to record total CPU utilization during the benchmark as well. 

We ran Borderlands 2 at 1920x1080, maximum image quality settings with only the PhysX configuration changing from Low, Medium and to High.

April 30, 2013 | 07:00 PM - Posted by Jeremy Hellstrom

I'm not sure that means what you think it means.

May 22, 2013 | 08:09 PM - Posted by Mack (not verified)

Fraps Benckmark @ 6080 x 1080 (Eyefinity Bezel compensation)

XfX Radeon HD7970 DD
Core i7 3820
RAM 16gb Hyperx
Mobo Intel DX79TO


Frames Time (ms) Min Max Avg
40444 1000247 22 101 40.434

All settings in high included Physx

Max Temp: 81*C

October 19, 2013 | 04:02 AM - Posted by capawesome9870

my system
AMD FX 8350
AMD HD 7870 2GB
Asus M5A99FX Pro R2
GSKILL 8GB (4GBx2) @1333MHz
320GB 5400RPM SATA2
Corsair 600w

i am running everything maxed out including CPU PhysX on High. about 80% of the time i do not notice any problems with performance of the game at all.

i do notice the giant performance hit from the "larger collections of PhysX simulations are running on the CPU." this is mainly apparent in areas like the Caustic Cavern when you fist get there. there is a pipe spewing out water and is spawns water until it can not spawn any more and then my FPS goes from 60-70 to a solid 20 with me just standing there. once i leave that room the FPS goes back up to 60+.

i also notice some times were there are small 1-2second slow downs.

ps. nvidia, when i have a little more cash i would like to get a PhysX GPU, BUT SOMEONE DISABLED THAT FUNCTIONALITY. i could get a 650 for $80 on newegg, or borrow the GTX 280 that i have in my other computer when i want to play this game.

September 13, 2014 | 12:35 AM - Posted by Gia (not verified)

WOW just what I was searching for. Came here by searching for useful

Feel free to surf to my blog :: Gia's best wordpress plugins

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote><p><br>
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.