Review Index:
Feedback

BFG GeForce 9800 GTX OCX Review - G92 at its finest

Author: Ryan Shrout
Manufacturer: BFG Tech
Tagged:

GPU-Z, Testing Methodology and System Setup

Using the new GPU-Z utility, we'll see how the new BFG 9800 GTX OCX compares to our reference speed cards.  For reference, NVIDIA set the 9880 GTX at 675 MHz core, 1688 MHz shader and 1100 memory clocks.

 

BFG certainly pushed these clocks up!  Running at 755 MHz core, 1890 MHz shader and 1150 MHz memory speeds, the raw processing power of the G92 GPU is pushed up fairly impressively.  The core clock and shader clocks are scaled about 12% on the new BFG while the memory speed is only scaled by 4.5%.  How these adjustments affect real-world gaming performance will be judged as we go through the benchmarks.

Testing Methodology

Graphics card testing has
become the most hotly debated issue in the hardware enthusiast
community recently.  Because of that, testing graphics cards has become
a much more complicated process than it once was.  Before you might
have been able to rely on the output of a few synthetic, automatic
benchmarks to make your video card purchase, that is just no longer the
case.  Video cards now cost up to $500 and we want to make sure that we
are giving the reader as much information as we can to aid you in your
purchasing decision.  We know we can't run every game or find every bug
and error, but we try to do what we can to aid you, our reader, and the
community as a whole.

With that in mind, all the
benchmarks that you will see in this review are from games that we
bought off the shelves just like you.  Of these games, there are two
different styles of benchmarks that need to be described.

The first is the
"timedemo-style" of benchmark.  Many of you may be familiar with this
style from games like Quake III; a "demo" is recorded in the game and a
set number of frames are saved in a file for playback.  When playing
back the demo, the game engine then renders the frames as quickly as
possible, which is why you will often see the "timedemo-style" of
benchmarks playing back the game much more quickly than you would ever
play the game.  In our benchmarks, the FarCry tests were done in this
matter: we recorded four custom demos and then played them back on each
card at each different resolution and quality setting.  Why does this
matter?  Because in these tests where timedemos are used, the line
graphs that show the frame rate at each second, each card may not end at the same time precisely
because one card is able to play it back faster than the other -- less
time passes and thus the FRAPs application gets slightly fewer frame
rates to plot.  However, the peaks and valleys and overall performance
of each card is still maintained and we can make a judged comparison of
the frame rates and performance.

The second type of benchmark
you'll see in this article are manual run throughs of a portion of a
game.  This is where we sit at the game with a mouse in one hand, a
keyboard under the other, and play the game to get a benchmark score. 
This benchmark method makes the graphs and data easy to read, but adds
another level of difficulty to the reviewer -- making the manual run
throughs repeatable and accurate.  I think we've accomplished this by
choosing a section of each game that provides us with a clear cut path.
We take three readings of each card and setting, average the scores,
and present those to you.  While this means the benchmarks are not
exact to the most minute detail, they are damn close and practicing
with this method for many days has made it clear to me that while this
method is time consuming, it is definitely a viable option for games
without timedemo support.

The second graph is a bar
graph that tells you the average framerate, the maximum framerate, and
the minimum framerate.  The minimum and average are important numbers
here as we want the minimum to be high enough to not affect our gaming
experience.  While it will be the decision of each individual gamer
what is the lowest they will allow, comparing the Min FPS to the line
graph and seeing how often this minimum occurs, should give you a good
idea of what your gaming experience will be like with this game, and
that video card on that resolution.

Our tests are completely based around the second type of benchmark method mentioned above -- the manual run through.

System Setup and Comparisons

We will be comparing the new BFG 9800 GTX OCX to the reference clocked BFG 9800 GTX card, the GeForce 8800 Ultra 768MB and AMD's Radeon HD 3870 X2 1GB. 

Test System Setup

CPU

Intel Core 2 Extreme X6800 - Review

Motherboards

EVGA nForce 680i Motherboard - Review

Intel 975XBX Motherboard (for CrossFire testing)

Memory 

Corsair TWIN2X2048-8500C4

Hard Drive

Western Digital Raptor 150 GB - Review

Sound Card

Sound Blaster Audigy 2 Value

Video Card

BFG 9800 GTX OCX 512MB

BFG 9800 GTX 512MB

NVIDIA 8800 Ultra 768MB

AMD Radeon HD 3870 X2 1GB

Video Drivers

NVIDIA Forceware 174.74 Beta

AMD Catalyst - 8.3

Power Supply PC Power and Cooling 1000 watt

DirectX Version

DX10

/ DX9c

Operating System

Windows Vista Ultimate 64-bit

  • Bioshock
  • Company of Heroes
  • Call of Duty 4

  • Call of Juarez
  • Lost Planet
  • World in Conflict
  • Unreal Tournament 3
  • Crysis

No comments posted yet.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote><p><br>
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.