Review Index:
Feedback

StarTech USB 3.0 Dual Video Laptop Docking Station Review

Manufacturer: StarTech

USB 3.0 Performance and Ethernet Performance

Testing Methodology and Setup

Our testing setup for the USB3SDOCKHDV included a Lenovo ThinkPad T440s with the following specs:

  • Windows 8.1 Pro 64-bit
  • Intel Core i5-4200U CPU @ 1.60 GHz (up to 2.30 GHz Turbo Boost)
  • 4 GB DDR3L RAM
  • Samsung 128 GB SSD

Each of our tests consisted of comparing results from direct output/connectivity from the notebook itself with results via the dock over USB 3.0. We took care to ensure conditions were identical under both tests, controlling such factors as background processes, heat, and so on wherever possible.

USB 3.0 Performance

Our initial tests were focused on the dock’s USB 3.0 performance; the chipset handling these connections is the Genesys GL3520. We first connected a USB 3.0 SSD with the capability of reading and writing at speeds near 180 MB/sec and 80 MB/sec (respectively) to both the notebook directly and through the dock and compared the results. Here’s what we came up with:

USB 3.0 Performance when directly connected to notebook:

View Full Size

USB 3.0 Performance when connected via StarTech dock:

View Full Size

In other words, no meaningful differences in transfer speeds. We also didn’t experience any heightened CPU consumption as a result of the dock's USB 3.0 connection versus that of the notebook.

Network Performance

Next, we turned our attention to network performance, beginning with throughput. The StarTech dock includes a Realtek RTL8211E chipset for this functionality; to measure the network throughput, we chose the freeware program iperf (instructions for use can be found at the link). Results are often finicky, so for our purposes, we averaged the best two runs of ten total for each connection type. Our tests gave us the following results:

  • 861125 Kb/sec connected directly to the notebook
  • 732774 Kb/sec connected via dock
  • 128351 Kb/sec (~15.6 MB/s) lower throughput using the dock

In terms of network CPU consumption, we noted an overall difference of around 5–7% higher on average when the dock was involved; this is pretty typical.

View Full Size

View Full Size

No surprises so far; apart from dedicated docking stations for machines with compatible ports, the presence of this minimal-yet-notable CPU overhead is generally commonplace due to the need for data compression between the notebook and the dock.

January 14, 2014 | 09:28 AM - Posted by TinkerToyTech

Steve, Could you please look into the "Pluggabe" USB 3.0 dual monitor Dock, it's one I've been looking at.
Thanks,
TinkerToyTech

January 21, 2014 | 03:22 PM - Posted by ButtonPuncher (not verified)

I've got the Lenovo ThinkPad USB 3.0 Dock and I really like it. Using it on a Surface 2 Pro mirroring the display. It's pretty flawless. I wonder how it compares directly to the StarTech?

BP

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote><p><br>
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.