Review Index:
Feedback

VIA KT400A Chipset Review

Author:
Subject: Chipsets
Manufacturer: VIA
Tagged:

Introduction

This content was originally featured on Amdmb.com and has been converted to PC Perspective's website. Some color changes and flaws may appear.

For the majority of the life of the Athlon processor, VIA has been the reigning king of the AMD chipsets. Their line starting with KT133/KX133 and all the way up to the KT333 chipset showed time and time again that they were the best and performance motherboard chipset in the AMD’s realm. That all came to a halt when the nForce2 chipset was released from NVIDIA this past year. For the first time, VIA found itself behind without a countermeasure chipset immediately ready for it. It was during this time that Hammer chipsets were into heavy development and was no doubt responsible for VIA’s diversion.


It would have been okay had AMD not delayed the Athlon 64 processor back to the fall of this year. VIA then needed another chipset to hold over their income and revenue until they can begin to reap the rewards of their work on the K8 chipsets. Not only that, but my feelings are that VIA would like to have themselves on the top of the proverbial totem pole of AMD chipsets BEFORE the release of the Hammer as well to give Athlon 64 buyers a better mindset on choosing the VIA over NVIDIA K8 chipset.

No comments posted yet.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote><p><br>
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.