All | Editorial | General Tech | Graphics Cards | Networking | Motherboards | Cases and Cooling | Processors | Chipsets | Memory | Displays | Systems | Storage | Mobile | Shows and Expos
Subject: Processors | December 21, 2006 - 05:36 PM | Ryan Shrout
Looks like AMD's new 65nm processors aren't going over as good as they'd have hoped for!
We're a little perplexed by these developments. Why would AMD increase the latency of its L2 cache, especially without increasing its size? Why isn't the die area of the 65nm Athlon 64 X2 even smaller compared to the 90nm version with the same transistor count? There are a number of possibilities, but I'll refrain from speculating for now, and we'll await some better answers from AMD.
Subject: Mobile | December 21, 2006 - 01:32 AM | Ryan Shrout
We'll be meeting with VIA while at CES next month, and the UMPC definitely seems to be where VIA is heading.
VIA Technologies is restructuring its business and taking aim at the Ultra-Mobile PCs (UMPCs) market, with the company expecting solid growth in the segment in 2007, according to VIA Technologies president and CEO, Wen-chi Chen.
Chen also indicated that 2008 and 2009 will be a turning point for VIA in the UMPC market.
Subject: Processors | December 21, 2006 - 01:27 AM | Ryan Shrout
Could it be that AMD is finally going to let go of the PR-rating system that was useless once the Athlon 64 was launched?
Such decision is a win-win strategy. As Intel realized clock speeds could no longer solely differentiate the performance of different, instead microarchitecture plays an important role in nowadays race, the MHz race ended and PR now more a less become meaningless.
Subject: Graphics Cards | December 21, 2006 - 01:25 AM | Ryan Shrout
Tired of console games getting all the attention? Then check out this interview at Joystiq.com that looks at how Vista and the "Games for Windows" initiative will help.
Games for Windows is still very much a vision. The first priority, a retail initiative, is currently underway.
Subject: Displays | December 21, 2006 - 01:21 AM | Ryan Shrout
So why does this new model of the Dell 30" monitor deserve a review seperate from the original?
Though we still feel Dell could have offered a few more connectivity options, as well and a bit more range of motion with its stand, it's safe to say that this gorgeous new 30" panel lives up to the rather lofty goal of refinement of the already impressive standard 3007WFP. The UltraSharp 3007WFP-HC is what
Subject: Processors | December 20, 2006 - 12:37 PM | Ryan Shrout
We just got official word from Intel that they are going to be releasing a new quad-core processor in early January. The Core 2 Quad Q6600 will run at 2.4 GHz with a 1066 MHz FSB and 8M of cache total. The TDP of the new CPU will be 105 watts and the default voltage is 1.325v.
IntelÂ® Core™2 Quad processor Q6600 (formerly codenamed Kentsfield)
- Multimedia powerhouse for demanding entertainment
- Ideal choice for processor intensive, highly-threaded applications
Subject: Mobile | December 20, 2006 - 12:34 PM | Ryan Shrout
HardOCP has reviewed a notebook from a company called Twinhead that claims to be spill proof and quite durable for everyday use. Are they impressed at all though?
What we've got here is a very basic, but very reliable, mobile computing solution. What it lacks in cutting edge technology, it makes up for in physical endurance.
Subject: Cases and Cooling | December 20, 2006 - 12:29 PM | Ryan Shrout
While this won't help most of you NOT going to CES this year, if any of you are, you can stop by the Zalman booth, watch a presentation and be entered to win one of two complete systems from our friends at Zalman.
a. HD160XT Silver
Subject: Processors | December 20, 2006 - 12:27 PM | Ryan Shrout
Tech Report has gotten a pair of the new 65nm processors, a 4800+ and 5000+, and put them through the paces on performance and power consumption. Can these new cores help AMD get back in competition with Intel?
That said, AMD could make one considerable stride toward countering Intel's quad-core chips and salvaging its poorly received Quad FX platform by replacing the Athlon 64 FX-70-series processorsâ€”and their scorching 125W TDP ratingsâ€”with chips made on this 65nm process.
Subject: Processors | December 19, 2006 - 01:46 PM | Ryan Shrout
The gang at HKEPC are saying now that Intel will be releasing a quad core Q6400 for a price under $450. That's the good news! The bad: it isn't planned until the third quarter of 2007.
Core 2 Quad Q6400 remains in Kentsfield core like others released models. Standards for this model include: 65nm manufacturing process, LGA 775 package, clock speed at 2.13Ghz, 1066MHz FSB, and 4MB x 2 L2 Cache.
Subject: Motherboards | December 19, 2006 - 01:42 PM | Ryan Shrout
Lost Circuits has sent over news of a new review they posted for the Asus M2R32-MVP motherboard that uses the AMD/ATI Radeon Xpress 3200 chipset.
As the MVP moniker alludes to, the M2R32 MVP does not feature the most opulent bundle in the world, in fact, if ASUS had named it "Spartan" instead of MVP, it would have been just on target as well.
Subject: Processors | December 19, 2006 - 01:38 PM | Ryan Shrout
It looks like Newegg has received a shipment of AMD's new Athlon FX-74, FX-72 and FX-70 processors and is preparing to offer them for sale very soon. They are NOT available yet, but we'll be checking Newegg.com's site for you often and will update you if we find them.
For now, you'll ONLY be able to buy these CPUs in combination with the Asus L1N64-SLI motherboard; priced at $349 apparently. The CPUs will be priced at $999, $799 and $599 for pairs of the 74s, 72s and 70s, respectivel
Subject: Graphics Cards | December 19, 2006 - 01:33 PM | Ryan Shrout
There are several good video card reviews that have popped up in the last few days, the first from the gang at HardOCP that looks at the Asus EN7900GS TOP. HotHardware has an updated review on performance of SLI configurations on the GeForce 8800 GTX and GTS cards. On the ATI front, XYZ Computing took a look at an upgraded version of
Subject: Processors | December 19, 2006 - 01:28 PM | Ryan Shrout
It appears that according this Inquirer article, Intel will be releasing a lower power consuming version of their Core 2 Duo E6300 and E6400 processors.
As a contrast, Core 2 Duo eats up 22 Watts while doing nothing and 65W when working under full load. With the new revision, power consumption in idle state (C1E) goes down to 12W.
Subject: Systems | December 18, 2006 - 06:32 PM | Ryan Shrout
Starting December 22nd, NVIDIA and their partners are giving away a component each and every day for a year!
Every day for a year, between December 22nd, 2006 and December 21st, 2007, NVIDIA will give away one SLI-Ready component to someone with an SLI-Ready, or SLI-enabled PC.
Each day, NVIDIA will draw a winner and post the winner's name here on SLIZONE.
Winners have exactly 7 days to contact NVIDIA and claim their prize - if they don't, they lose the prize and it goes bac
Subject: Processors | December 18, 2006 - 12:40 AM | Ryan Shrout
Ever want to watch an AMD analyst day presentation to see if you can read more into the slides than the rest of the media.
Advanced Micro Devices 2006 Analyst Day
Thursday, December 14, 2006 8:00 a.m. ET
Duration 4 Hours
Location New York, NY
Subject: Processors | December 18, 2006 - 12:36 AM | Ryan Shrout
The gang at Anandtech has published their tests looking at the new Opteron Socket-F processors and the new Xeon processors from Intel as well.
Some might wonder if a different - read Intel - motherboard for the Woodcrest system could have significantly altered the outcome of these tests. We do not think so. Although the Intel motherboards do tend to show slightly lower power consumption, it is not a significant difference.
Subject: Graphics Cards | December 16, 2006 - 11:20 PM | Ryan Shrout
The Inquirer seems to have gotten the smell of a new rumor that ATI/AMD might be moving high end graphics configurations OUTSIDE of your case into another one in order to improve heat issues....do we really need this??
This brings the story back around to separate cases with one for CPU/memory/drives and one for graphics. It would solve a lot of problems. Separate power, separate cooling, plenty of space, etc.
Subject: Processors | December 16, 2006 - 11:17 PM | Ryan Shrout
While the 65nm processors from AMD should soon be hitting the streets for everyone to buy, Anandtech got a set of them a bit early and put them to the test to see if power/performance was improved.
Overall we're left with mixed feelings after playing with AMD's first 65nm chips. Power consumption is definitely reduced compared to its 90nm offerings; in our tests we saw an average reduction in total system power consumption of 14.6W thanks to the new Brisbane core.
Get notified when we go live!