All | Editorial | General Tech | Graphics Cards | Networking | Motherboards | Cases and Cooling | Processors | Chipsets | Memory | Displays | Systems | Storage | Mobile | Shows and Expos
Subject: Processors | January 8, 2007 - 07:35 PM | Jeremy Hellstrom
Although 2.4 GHz is slower than the 6700, the reduced cost and power consumption make this processor more attractive to a broader range of people. There isn't a lot of information about the performance of the processor yet, but The Tech Report tells you everything known so far.
Subject: Processors | January 8, 2007 - 06:36 PM | Jeremy Hellstrom
INTERNATIONAL 2007 CONSUMER ELECTRONICS SHOW, Las Vegas, Jan. 8, 2007 — Intel Corporation formally introduced three more quad-core processors, including the first to carry the IntelÂ® Core™2 Quad processor brand name that begins the expansion of quad-core PC sales to mainstream buyers. Intel now offers a total of nine quad-core processor versions in the desktop and enterprise market segments.
Subject: Processors | January 5, 2007 - 09:23 PM | Jeremy Hellstrom
In order to further solidify its positions of the market of
high-performance microprocessors and popularize quad-core chips, Intel
Corp. will sell its highly-anticipated central processing units (CPUs)
with four processing engines at significantly lower price-points than
it so far has been expected.
Subject: Processors | January 3, 2007 - 09:11 PM | Ryan Shrout
The guys at Tech Report noticed that even though the Quad FX parts are available for sale now, they aren't the prices AMD quoted to everyone last month.
Of course, we should point out that neither AMD nor Asus have control over retail prices. Still, at those prices, someone looking to build a machine with a pair of Athlon 64 FX-74 chips will have to pay with a premium of either $129 or $181, depending on the retailer.
Subject: Processors | December 28, 2006 - 08:53 PM | Ryan Shrout
VIA Announces EPIA Mini-ITX Platform for x86 Consumer Electronics
First to feature the VIA CX700M2 advanced system media processor, the VIA EPIA EX-Series mainboard is the ultimate digital media device platform
Taipei, Taiwan, 28 December 2006 - VIA Technologies, Inc, a leading innovator and developer of silicon chip technologies and PC platform solutions, today announced the VIA EPIA EX-Series Mini-ITX mainboards, the first of VIA's compact platforms to feature the new VIA CX700M2 system media processor.
Subject: Processors | December 28, 2006 - 08:52 PM | Ryan Shrout
Not a big news break here, since we are taking about 9 months from now, but apparently AMD Live! will support Blu-ray and HD-DVD in the third quarter of next year. My only question is why is this so far off?
Subject: Processors | December 27, 2006 - 04:01 PM | Ryan Shrout
Las Vegas Convention Center, Dec. 27, 2006 — Major themes will surface at the 2007 International Consumer Electronics Show including: the emergence of Internet-delivered entertainment as the PC grows even cozier with the TV; the 'renaissance' of the PC with new Intel dual and quad core processors and exciting new operating systems; and the ongoing growth of PC gaming.
Subject: Processors | December 27, 2006 - 04:00 PM | Ryan Shrout
A couple of different sites have come across some updated AMD road maps this week. First, Chile Hardware has news on the AMD chipset front, including the upcoming ATI RD790 chipset with CrossFire support.
Also, Akiba PC has some news on the AMD CPU front. Bring your translater!!
Thanks to HardOCP for the links!
Subject: Processors | December 21, 2006 - 10:41 PM | Ryan Shrout
Maybe feeling the pressure from Intel's extreme R&D resources, AMD is opening a new design lab outside Redmond, Washington.
REDMOND, WASH. -- December 21, 2006 --AMD (NYSE: AMD) today announced the formation of a new Advanced Architecture and Technology Lab led by Rich Witek, AMD corporate fellow and chief architectural officer.
Subject: Processors | December 21, 2006 - 10:36 PM | Ryan Shrout
Looks like AMD's new 65nm processors aren't going over as good as they'd have hoped for!
We're a little perplexed by these developments. Why would AMD increase the latency of its L2 cache, especially without increasing its size? Why isn't the die area of the 65nm Athlon 64 X2 even smaller compared to the 90nm version with the same transistor count? There are a number of possibilities, but I'll refrain from speculating for now, and we'll await some better answers from AMD.
Subject: Processors | December 21, 2006 - 06:27 AM | Ryan Shrout
Could it be that AMD is finally going to let go of the PR-rating system that was useless once the Athlon 64 was launched?
Such decision is a win-win strategy. As Intel realized clock speeds could no longer solely differentiate the performance of different, instead microarchitecture plays an important role in nowadays race, the MHz race ended and PR now more a less become meaningless.
Subject: Processors | December 20, 2006 - 05:37 PM | Ryan Shrout
We just got official word from Intel that they are going to be releasing a new quad-core processor in early January. The Core 2 Quad Q6600 will run at 2.4 GHz with a 1066 MHz FSB and 8M of cache total. The TDP of the new CPU will be 105 watts and the default voltage is 1.325v.
IntelÂ® Core™2 Quad processor Q6600 (formerly codenamed Kentsfield)
- Multimedia powerhouse for demanding entertainment
- Ideal choice for processor intensive, highly-threaded applications
Subject: Processors | December 20, 2006 - 05:27 PM | Ryan Shrout
Tech Report has gotten a pair of the new 65nm processors, a 4800+ and 5000+, and put them through the paces on performance and power consumption. Can these new cores help AMD get back in competition with Intel?
That said, AMD could make one considerable stride toward countering Intel's quad-core chips and salvaging its poorly received Quad FX platform by replacing the Athlon 64 FX-70-series processorsâ€”and their scorching 125W TDP ratingsâ€”with chips made on this 65nm process.
Subject: Processors | December 19, 2006 - 06:46 PM | Ryan Shrout
The gang at HKEPC are saying now that Intel will be releasing a quad core Q6400 for a price under $450. That's the good news! The bad: it isn't planned until the third quarter of 2007.
Core 2 Quad Q6400 remains in Kentsfield core like others released models. Standards for this model include: 65nm manufacturing process, LGA 775 package, clock speed at 2.13Ghz, 1066MHz FSB, and 4MB x 2 L2 Cache.
Subject: Processors | December 19, 2006 - 06:38 PM | Ryan Shrout
It looks like Newegg has received a shipment of AMD's new Athlon FX-74, FX-72 and FX-70 processors and is preparing to offer them for sale very soon. They are NOT available yet, but we'll be checking Newegg.com's site for you often and will update you if we find them.
For now, you'll ONLY be able to buy these CPUs in combination with the Asus L1N64-SLI motherboard; priced at $349 apparently. The CPUs will be priced at $999, $799 and $599 for pairs of the 74s, 72s and 70s, respectivel
Subject: Processors | December 19, 2006 - 06:28 PM | Ryan Shrout
It appears that according this Inquirer article, Intel will be releasing a lower power consuming version of their Core 2 Duo E6300 and E6400 processors.
As a contrast, Core 2 Duo eats up 22 Watts while doing nothing and 65W when working under full load. With the new revision, power consumption in idle state (C1E) goes down to 12W.
Subject: Processors | December 18, 2006 - 05:40 AM | Ryan Shrout
Ever want to watch an AMD analyst day presentation to see if you can read more into the slides than the rest of the media.
Advanced Micro Devices 2006 Analyst Day
Thursday, December 14, 2006 8:00 a.m. ET
Duration 4 Hours
Location New York, NY
Subject: Processors | December 18, 2006 - 05:36 AM | Ryan Shrout
The gang at Anandtech has published their tests looking at the new Opteron Socket-F processors and the new Xeon processors from Intel as well.
Some might wonder if a different - read Intel - motherboard for the Woodcrest system could have significantly altered the outcome of these tests. We do not think so. Although the Intel motherboards do tend to show slightly lower power consumption, it is not a significant difference.
Subject: Processors | December 17, 2006 - 04:17 AM | Ryan Shrout
While the 65nm processors from AMD should soon be hitting the streets for everyone to buy, Anandtech got a set of them a bit early and put them to the test to see if power/performance was improved.
Overall we're left with mixed feelings after playing with AMD's first 65nm chips. Power consumption is definitely reduced compared to its 90nm offerings; in our tests we saw an average reduction in total system power consumption of 14.6W thanks to the new Brisbane core.
Subject: Processors | December 17, 2006 - 04:14 AM | Ryan Shrout
The tech wizards at The Tech Report have compiled a review comparing the latest in Intel's server/workstation line to the Socket-F AMD Opteron processors released earlier in the year. They do a fantastic job looking at the power and performance of almost exactly configured systems and this article is definitely worth a read!
You might also want to see what the Tech Report found out about AMD's upcoming processor