Comcast Testing 300GB, up to 600GB Data Caps in Two Cities

Subject: General Tech | September 21, 2012 - 04:24 AM |
Tagged: isp, data cap, Comcast, bandwidth

Comcast’s 250GB per month data cap was proved an unpopular but necessary evil (in the sense that it cannot be avoided). The company suspended its data capping earlier this year to reevaluate its data caps and how they affect users. That temporary freedom is not slated to last, however as Comcast will be re-instating caps in the future (as soon as next year, by many reports). Currently, Comcast is testing a single 300GB cap across all tiers in Nashville, Tennessee, and on October 1st it will begin another data cap strategy in Tucson, Arizona.

View Full Size

In Tuscon, Comcast will be mixing things up a bit by pairing the higher (faster) tiers of service with larger data caps. For example, the Blast tier (25/4 in many markets) will have an additional 50GB for a total cap of 350GB per month. The next highest tier – Extreme 50 – will get a 450GB cap, and so on. This is a good thing, because it allows the caps to scale with speed. Otherwise, the faster the speed tier, the worse value it becomes as it will just allow you to burn through your data cap faster. When the caps scale with speed, that problem is eliminated. Interestingly, this method seems to be the one that Comcast is leaning towards using, because a source –when talking to DSL Reports – has stated that when Comcast reinstates caps nationwide, customers will have a 500GB caps while lower tiers will Performance tier users will receive only a 300GB cap. Specifically, the source stated “faster speed tiers will see higher caps.”

Personally, if I have to endure caps, I would much rather have this scalable cap system rathen than a one-size-fits-all number for every tier like the company is implementing in Nashville (and has in the past with its 250GB per month cap). It will be interesting to see exactly how it will scale the caps once they are official, and how often Comcast will consider raising its caps as more and more services move "to the cloud."

Comcast Internet Packages and Accompanying Data Caps
Comcast Internet Tiers Data Cap (Nashville, TN) Data Cap (Tucson, AZ) Overage Charge (both cities) - $/50GB
Economy 300GB 300GB $10
Economy Plus 300GB 300GB $10
Internet Essentials 300GB 300GB $10
Performance Starter 300GB 300GB $10
Performance 300GB 300GB $10
Blast 300GB 350GB $10
Extreme 50 300GB 450GB $10
Extreme 105 300GB 600GB $10
Extreme 305 Unknown Unknown $10

Another bit of (surprising) news is that Comcast is being rather reasonable in its overage policy for customers that exceed the cap in the test markets. Customers that go over the cap in a month will be notified by both an email and webpage notification. Should the customer wish to continue to use the Internet service, Comcast will provide additional 50GB blocks for $10 each, which works out to 20 cents per Gigabyte. That is not bad at all, especially compared to wireless data overages that customers have begrudgingly become accustomed to. 

Even better, Comcast will give each customer up to three warnings before charging for additional data. If customers go over their caps for three months in one year, they will not be charged for additional data usage. After the three “courtesy notices,” it’s back to $10/50GB. The overage charge and three warning system applies to both test markets, which seems to suggest that it has a good chance of being implemented nationwide.

At least in the testing markets, Comcast is being much more generous than it has in the past. I’m interested to see what the cable providing-giant that is Comcast actually ends up doing once it puts caps in place around the nation. Specifically, how standardized the caps and overage charges are across all of the markets, and whether it will be more aggressive in areas where it has a monopoly where customers can not fall back to AT&T’s U-Verse or Verizon’s FIOS service (among other options, though I don’t count satellite or dial up as those are not really competitive to wired broadband). Right now though, I think Comcast is moving towards a system that is an acceptable compromise between customer freedom and its business interests. [Please don’t mess this up, Comcast.]

What are your thoughts, do you think the proposed caps are fair? I do concede that data caps suck, and it is definitely possible to exceed the caps with legitimate services, but it does look as though caps are here to stay. Here's hoping Comcast remains at least as reasonable with the entire US as it is with its test markets.

Read more about Comcast's data cap test markets.

Image courtesy Chauncey Davis via Flickr Creative Commons. Thank you.

Source: Ars Technica
September 21, 2012 | 12:49 PM - Posted by Rick (not verified)

this is what i used last month

total
Last month 744:0 9,080 290,866 299,947

September 21, 2012 | 10:01 PM - Posted by orvtrebor

I'm glad they are adjusting the cap policy's to scale with speed/tiers but as a whole this is just a bunch of crap.

Caps on over priced and under performing internet services...

Well I guess it's still better than what Canada has to suffer through.

September 21, 2012 | 11:50 PM - Posted by Anonymous (not verified)

I'd rather have no caps since people like myself can break it down and go on for days as to how they're just screwing you either way you look at it. But since the option is between taking it in the rear with vaseline or no vaseline, I suppose scaling would make more sense. In the end you're still getting raped violently.

I'd rather they be smart and logical and throttle connection speeds if "usage of bandwidth was excessive on the node" instead of this BS charge for Gig strat. But hey, Wireless companies are making billions of free non-bandwidth stealing Text Messages and plans, and billions more on Internet plans slower than dial up in most places. It only makes sense to go the route that brings you more profits and keeping the big lie going.

September 22, 2012 | 04:40 AM - Posted by Tim Verry

Yup, that's pretty much my line of thinking (lesser of two evils :( ). It sucks but at least Comcast is not being as evil as they usually are lol.

September 22, 2012 | 06:02 PM - Posted by bosspatrone (not verified)

I'm so tire of defeatest thinking. It doesn't have to be data caps or tiered data caps. We could stand together and collectively speak out and demand this kind of shit be put to a stop, but we are all so used to it now that we don't even bother. I'm as guilty of this as anyone, but I'm getting to the point that I just want to fight like hell.

I happen to live in Nashville, and between myself, my girlfriend, my two daughters, and my roommate, 300Gb is an incredibly low bar to hit. We now have to throttle our own traffic and downgrade video quality on Netflix and Youtube, just to barely keep under the cap.

I find myself working harder and harder for the same stagnant wage as the value of my dollar erodes and the price for goods skyrockets while the overall quality plummets. I just want to work honestly, raise my family, and enjoy what little downtime I have, but I am constantly squeezed by the tentacles of greed.

I have huge worries about Google, but in this case, the enemy of my enemy is my friend. I hope Google Fiber destroys them and then I hope we get some decent protections from corporate gouging.

May 18, 2013 | 04:38 AM - Posted by Evelyne (not verified)

I was reading some of your content on
this website and I think this internet site is actually informative!
Keep on posting.

Also visit my web page: Evelyne

September 21, 2012 | 11:50 PM - Posted by Anonymous (not verified)

I'd rather have no caps since people like myself can break it down and go on for days as to how they're just screwing you either way you look at it. But since the option is between taking it in the rear with vaseline or no vaseline, I suppose scaling would make more sense. In the end you're still getting raped violently.

I'd rather they be smart and logical and throttle connection speeds if "usage of bandwidth was excessive on the node" instead of this BS charge for Gig strat. But hey, Wireless companies are making billions of free non-bandwidth stealing Text Messages and plans, and billions more on Internet plans slower than dial up in most places. It only makes sense to go the route that brings you more profits and keeping the big lie going.

April 4, 2013 | 07:34 AM - Posted by Matthew B. Howell (not verified)

Just finished a chat session with a Comcast CSR (I'm assuming he/she was in another country as the grammar was horrible) and was told that they could not even give me a general ETA on when the new bandwidth caps would roll out.

April 4, 2013 | 07:59 AM - Posted by Matthew B. Howell (not verified)

If anyone is interested, I just had the following phone conversation with a Comcast CSR regarding the bandwidth caps:

Me: "Will the new bandwidth caps be rolled out before I die in 60 years?" (I have an odd sense of humor)

Comcast CSR: "Yes."

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote><p><br>
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.