Introduction, Specifications, and Packaging
Introduction
Just over a month ago, OCZ released the Vertex 3, an immediate follow-up to the Vertex 3 Pro. At the time they promised an even cheaper solution at some point down the line. We've now seen that come to pass. Following the same convention as with the last series, the lower cost solution will be called the Agility 3. This is meant to be a mid-grade performance drive, as there is to also be a 'Solid 3' model on the horizon, but for today we'll focus on the new Agility.
Specifications
60GB Max Performance*
- Max Read: up to 525MB/s
- Max Write: up to 475MB/s
- Random Write 4KB: 50,000 IOPS
- Maximum 4K Random Write: 80,000 IOPS
120GB Max Performance*
- Max Read: up to 525MB/s
- Max Write: up to 500MB/s
- Random Write 4KB: 50,000 IOPS
- Maximum 4K Random Write: 85,000 IOPS
240GB Max Performance*
- Max Read: up to 525MB/s
- Max Write: up to 500MB/s
- Random Write 4KB: 45,000 IOPS
- Maximum 4K Random Write: 85,000 IOPS
*Max performance achieved using Native SATA 6Gbps chipset. Please refer to product sheet for additional performance metrics.
Their * note is very important. You won't be able to hit the best possible performance marks without using these newest SATA 6Gb/sec drives in conjunction with native SATA 6Gb/sec storage controllers. There are just too many bottlenecks and other irregularities seen with the aftermarket / add-on solutions at this time, and they just can't stack up against a good native chipset implementation.
Yet another Sandforce drive, the PQI S535 256GB SSD
Subject: Storage | May 27, 2011 - 01:00 PM | Jeremy Hellstrom
Tagged: ssd, sandforce, PQI, SF-1200
While Legit Reviews might be mixing their metaphors when they refer to Sandforce SSDs as a 'dime' a dozen, they are certainly right that there are a lot of companies implementing that particular controller. This time it is PQI, long time sellers of flash memory based products, and their PQI S535 256 GB drive. One thing that makes this company different is that the speeds advertised on the box were slower than what Legit Reviews saw in their benchmarks. See just how much faster in the full review.
"At this point there isn't a lot new we can say about the PQI S535 256 GB drive as SF-1200 based SSDs are a dime a dozen right now. Ok, that may draw ire from those that are still waiting on buying an SSD because of the cost but we've done no less than ten reviews now on such drives. PQI is a little conservative in their specifications of 250 MB/s reads and writes as we saw well above that for each in the ATTO benchmark..."
Here are some more Storage reviews from around the web:
- Crucial m4 256GB @ TechSpot
- OCZ Vertex 2 60GB SSD @ HardwareBistro
- Silicon Power V20 120GB SandForce SF-1200 SSD @ Tweaktown
- OCZ Vertex 3 120GB SSD Review @ ITShootOut
- OCZ RevoDrive 80 GB PCI Express Solid State Drive @ TechARP
- OWC Mercury EXTREME Pro 6G 120GB SSD Review @ Legit Reviews
- OCZ Agility 3 (240GB) @ AnandTech
- OCZ Vertex 3 Max IOPS Edition SSD @ Benchmark Reviews
- OCZ Vertex 3 Max IOPS SSD vs Crucial M4 and Intel 510 Review @ HardwareHeaven
- Patriot Torqx 2 128GB SATA II SSD Review @Hi Tech Legion
- OCZ Technology Vertex 3 240GB Retail Solid State @ Tweaktown
- Samsung PM800 128GB mSATA SSD Review - Samsung Quietly Releases another Top Tier SSD @ SSD Review
- Intel Smart Response Technology Explained @ Hardware Secrets
- Mach Xtreme MX-GX USB 3.0 16GB Thumb Drive @ Tweaktown
- Beginners Guide: Intel Smart Response Technology @ PCSTATS
- Thecus N3200XXX NAS @ TechSpot
- Patriot Memory Supersonic USB 3.0 Flash Drive @ Modders-Inc
- QNAP TS-119P+ Single Bay HOME/SOHO NAS Review @ Tweaknews
Very colourful and extremely fast; meet OWC's Mercury Extreme Pro 6G
Subject: Storage | May 5, 2011 - 04:29 PM | Jeremy Hellstrom
Tagged: owc, ocz, ssd, 120gb, sata 6Gps, sandforce
OWC appeared on the SSD scene in partnership with Apple, though they sold drives to PC users as well. Their current generation uses SandForce's Release Candidate firmware for the SF-2281 controller as opposed to OCZ's official firmware that is present in the Vertex 3 SSDs. That is not the only difference, OCZ rolled their own PCB while OWC went with a design that caused a few raised eyebrows at AnandTech. Read their full review to see how the performance evened out.
"I still don't get how OWC managed to beat OCZ to market last year with the Mercury Extreme SSD. The Vertex LE was supposed to be the first SF-1500 based SSD on the market, but as I mentioned in our review of OWC's offering - readers had drives in hand days before the Vertex LE even started shipping.
I don't believe the same was true this time around. The Vertex 3 was the first SF-2200 based SSD available for purchase online, but OWC was still a close second. Despite multiple SandForce partners announcing drives based on the controller, only OCZ and OWC are shipping SSDs with SandForce's SF-2200 inside."
Here is some more Tech News from around the web:
- OCZ Vertex 3 240GB SSD Review @ Hardware Canucks
- Corsair Performance 3 2x128GB SSD RAID Report @ Tweaktown
- OWC Mercury Extreme Pro 6G 240GB SSD Review - 500MB/s Sets The New Standard @ The SSD Review
- Intel SSD 320 Series (25nm) - 300Gb @ Funky Kit
- Intel SSD 510 Series 120GB @ TechSpot
- OCZ Technology Vertex 3 120GB Retail Solid State Drive @ Tweaktown
- Kingston SSDNow V+100 vs. Samsung 470 Series 256 GB SSD @ Hardware Secrets
- Icy Dock MB991IK-B @ Hardware Bistro
- Netgear Stora Home Media Network Storage Review @ Legit Reviews
- Icy Dock SSD 4 in 1 SSD RAID Cages and SSD Conversion Kits - A Quick Look @ The SSD Review
- ICY DOCK MB974SP-B Internal 4-bay Enclosure Review @ ThinkComputers
- LSI 9265-8i 6Gbps MegaRAID Card RAID 5 Tested! - Just The 9265 & 8 Micron C300 SSDs @ The SSD Review
- Patriot LX Pro 32GB Class 10 SDHC Memory Card @ Hi Tech Legion
- Patriot 32GB Supersonic USB 3.0 Flash Drive Review @ Madshrimps
- « first
- ‹ previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4

