Subject: General Tech, Graphics Cards | May 10, 2011 - 08:52 PM | Tim Verry
Tagged: nvidia, jpr, gpu, amd
The last quarter of 2010 saw shipments totalling 18.84 million units. In 2011, shipments rose slightly by 2% to 19.03 million add-in cards. According to JPR (Jon Peddie Research), while Q1 of 2011 behaved similarly to past years seasonally, it did not fair as well overall as shipments did not exceed those of Q1 2010. Where AMD increased units shipped by 5.7% versus the previous quarter (Q4 2010), NVIDIA saw a 2% decrease.
JPR notes that while increase in units shipped versus Q4 2010 was rather slight, it remains a positive change due to Q4 2010 behaving irregularly regarding the seasonal cycle.
The increased units shipped further reflect changes in market share for the two largest discrete graphics card makers. Versus last quarter, NVIDIA lost 2.7% of the market while AMD gained 4.4%. JPR states that AMD has gained 16.6% market share while rival NVIDIA lost 8.4 on a year-to-year basis.
JRP's reported market shares over time.
John Peddie Research notes that of the 19.03 million discrete graphics cards shipped, NVIDIA was the clear market leader, thanks in part to sales of CUDA and GPU-Compute cards used in scientific and data research. The add-in board market is further composed of three main segments that amount to the 19.03 million boards shipped. On the high end rests the enthusiast gamer (approx. 9 million sold per year) and GPU-compute markets which exists as lower volume of sales but higher price per card. The majority of graphics card shipments come from the mainstream market which is a balance of price and volume. Finally, the workstation segment which is smaller than even the enthusiast gaming market but traditionally sees higher average asking prices for the hardware that is shipped.
JPR estimates that the add-in market will fall 4.5% to $19.8 billion USD despite positive increases in the number of cards shipped due to "a gradual decline in the ASP."
As the chart illustrates, NVIDIA still remains the market juggernaut, shipping 11.25 million cards; however, AMD has made a lot of headway in the past year. With both the AMD 6950 and Nvidia 560ti proving to be the cards of choice by many gamers worldwide competition is healthy and enthusiasts have only to benefit from the market's positive increases.
Subject: Processors, Chipsets, Mobile | May 9, 2011 - 09:07 PM | Tim Verry
Tagged: PowerVR, Intel, gpu, atom
In a surprising move, Intel plans to move away from using it's own graphics processors with the next "full fat" Atom processors. Intel has traditionally favored its own graphics chipsets; however, VR-Zone reports that Intel has extended it's licensing agreements with PowerVR to include certain GPU architectures.
These GPU licenses will allow Intel to implement a PowerVR SGX545 equivalent graphics core with its Cedarview Atom chips. While the PowerVR graphics core is no match for dedicated GPUs or likely that found in Intel's own Sandy Bridge "HD 3000" series, the hardware will allow Atom powered systems to play video with ease thanks to hardware accelerated decodding of "MPEG-2, MPEG-4 part 2, VC1, WMV9 and the all-important H.264 codec." VR-Zone details the SGX545 GPU as being capable of "40 million triangles/s and 1Gpixles/s using a 64-bit bus" at the chips original 200mhz.
Intel plans to clock the mobile chips at 400mhz and the desktop graphics cores at 640mhz. The graphics cores will be capable of resolutions up to 1440x900 and supports VGA, HDMI 1.3a and Display Port 1.1 connections for video output. DirectX 10.1 support is also stated by VR-Zone to be supported by the SGX545, which means that the net-top versions of Atom may be capable of running the Aero desktop smoothly.
This integration by Intel of a GPU capable of hardware video acceleration will certainly make Nvidia's ION chipsets harder to justify for HTPC usage. ION chipsets will likely reliquish marketshare to cheaper stock Intel Atom platforms for basic home theater computers, but will still remain viable in the more specific market using ION + Atom chips as light gaming platforms in the living room.
Subject: General Tech | May 4, 2011 - 11:19 AM | Jeremy Hellstrom
Tagged: peddie, nvidia, market share, Intel, gpu, amd
SemiAccurate got hold of Jon Peddie's most recent look at the GPU market and how it is divvied up between the major competitors; which doesn't include SIS who hit 0% this year. The two current discreet GPU makers swapped positions last quarter with AMD in the lead and that remains true this quarter as they have grown to 24.8% while NVIDIA fell to 20%. Last year at this time NVIDIA had a comfortable 8% more of the market than AMD, but with a Fermi launch that just didn't go as well as hoped and AMD coming out strong and generally less expensive, that lead has evaporated thanks not only to the discreet GPUs but also Brazos.
Speaking of APUs, the more mathematically inclined readers may notice that a large chunk of the graphics market is missing in those figures. 54.4% of that missing market belongs to Intel who have seen their share of the market jump by alnost 10% since Q1 2010. The vast majority of their market share belongs to the embedded GPU present in many Intel systems but at least some of that growth is thanks to the new SandyBridge platform which many enthusiasts are purchasing and which counts towards market share even if it is only being used for transcoding in a system with a discreet GPU.
"The latest GPU marketshare numbers from Jon Peddie are out, and it looks like we have a new leader in GPUs, AMD. According to the numbers released today, Q1 saw AMD overtake Nvidia in year over year GPU marketshare, and the turn-around promised last February fizzle."
Here is some more Tech News from around the web:
- The HTML5 future of the web starts to take shape @ The Inquirer
- HP engineering veep spills cloud plans onto LinkedIn @ The Register
- How-To: Portal Sentry Turret Egg Cup @ Make:Blog
- Seagate to control 40% of HDD market with Samsung acquisition, says IHS iSuppli @ DigiTimes
- Canon PowerShot SX230 HS Review @ TechReviewSource
- Level One Wireless 300Mbps N_Max Ceiling PoE Access and 4 GE PoE + 1 GE Switch Review @ OverclockersHQ
- DemoCamp April 2011 Coverage @ t-break
- Win a MSI N550GTX-Ti graphics card @ t-break
- Win a Linksys E3000 wireless router @ t-break
- Win a ECS Black GTX460 graphics card @ t-break
Subject: General Tech, Graphics Cards | May 3, 2011 - 11:54 AM | Jeremy Hellstrom
Tagged: e6760, embedded, gpu, amd, eyefinity
Usually reading off a list of the abilities of an embedded GPU are fairly quick ... determine if it can handle YouTube in high definition and maybe play WoW and move on. APUs offer a bit more interest for enthusiasts with interesting load sharing applications with a discreet GPU and the rise of SandyBridge and Bobcat seem to spell the end of the GPU embedded on a motherboard. However there are still a few tricks left before the end of the line, the new Radeon E6760 isn't going to win many speed races but it can support up to 6 monitors, a nice trick when you consider that many of these chips will be running displays in casinos, airports and medical imaging. The E4690 is finally retiring, meet the new E6760 at AnandTech.
"Kicking off our coverage of embedded GPUs is AMD’s Radeon E6760, which is launching today. The E6760 is the latest and greatest AMD embedded video card, utilizing the Turks GPU (6600/6700M) from AMD’s value lineup. The E6760 isn’t a product most of us will be buying directly, but if AMD has it their way it’s a product a lot of us will be seeing in action in the years to come in embedded devices."
Here is some more Tech News from around the web:
- SandForce SF-2141 Controller & Intel Z68 Chipset: Destined to be Together @ Tweaktown
- It's Official: AT&T Broadband Subscribers Wake Up Today with Data Caps @ Techgage
- The day before BlackBerry World 2011 kicks in @ t-break
- Nvidia offers low-end laptop as replacement for Bumpgate victims @ The Inquirer
- Android Ice Cream Sandwich OS draws closer @ The Inquirer
- Win a GIGIABYTE 2GB Radeon HD6950 @ Bjorn3D
A Card Unlike Any Other
In all honesty, there aren't many graphics cards that really get our attention these days. There are GPUs that do that - releases like the Radeon HD 6990 and the GeForce GTX 590 get our juices flowing to see what new performance and features they can offer. But in terms of individual vendor-specific designs, there are very few that make us "perk up" much more than just seeing another reference card come across the test bed.
The ASUS ARES dual-5870 card was probably the last one do to that - and for $1200 is better have! EVGA is ready with another card though that definitely made us interested, and for a much more reasonable price of $419 or so.
The EVGA GeForce GTX 460 2WIN is a custom built card that combines a pair of GTX 460 1GB GPUs on a single PCB to create a new level of performance and pricing that we found was unmatched in the market today. And even better, the features improved as well by utilizing the power of both GPUs in an SLI configuration.
Read on and see why the GTX 460 2WIN might be my new favorite graphics card!
Subject: Graphics Cards, Motherboards | April 26, 2011 - 02:19 PM | Ryan Shrout
Tagged: virtu, synergy, optimus, nvidia, lucid, gpu
Remember when we previewed a piece of software from Lucid called Virtu that promised the capability to combine processor graphics features of the Intel Sandy Bridge lineup with the performance and DX11 support of discrete graphics cards from NVIDIA and AMD? The ideas was pretty simple but it addressed one of our major complaints about the initial Sandy Bridge processor launch: the IGP features like fast video transcode acceleration and ultra-low-power video acceleration were unavailable to users that chose to also use a discrete graphics solution.
Lucid's Virtu software running in our previous testing
Lucid's solution was to "virtualize" the GPUs and use a software layer that would decide which applications to run on the discrete GPU and which to run on the integrated processor graphics on the Intel CPU. There were some limitations including the need to have the displays connected to the IGP outputs rather than the discrete card and that the software worked on a rather clunky white-list implementation. Also, discrete graphics control panels were a bit of a headache and only worked with NVIDIA cards and not in all cases even then.
Virtu was to be distributed through motherboard vendors starting with the release of the Z68 chipset (as it was the first mainstream chipset to support overclocking AND display outputs) but now it appears that NVIDIA itself is diving into the same realm with a new piece of software called "Synergy".
Check out more after the break!
Subject: Graphics Cards | April 19, 2011 - 01:08 PM | Jeremy Hellstrom
Tagged: turks, northern islands, gpu, amd
The new Turk based Radeon HD 6670 and HD 6570 are intended to replace the Redwood-based HD 5670 and HD 5570 at a price of $99 and $79 respectively. The cards are very similar to the cards they replace so you should not expect miracles from them. They do have reduced power draw and are both low profile cards making them a good choice for HTPCs and AnandTech is quick to point out that these are the fastest cards not requiring an external power supply on the market right now.
"Two weeks ago we saw the paper launch of the Radeon HD 6450, the low-end member of AMD’s Northern Islands family of GPUs. It was a solid product for HTPC use and a very notable improvement over the 5450 it replaced, but it was an uncharacteristically delayed launch for AMD. At the same time we noted that the Northern Islands family had one more GPU we had not seen: Turks."
Here are some more Graphics Card articles from around the web:
- Sapphire Radeon HD6570 @ Techware Labs
- HIS IceQ X HD 6850 Review @ t-break
- AMD's Sub-$100 Line-up: Radeon HD 6450, 6570 & 6670 Review @ Techgage
- Sapphire Radeon HD 6670 and HD 6570 @ Tweaktown
- AMD Radeon HD 6670 & HD 6570 Review @ Neoseeker
- AMD Radeon HD 6670 1GB & HD 6570 512MB Review @ Hardware Canucks
- AMD Radeon HD 6670 1 GB @ techPowerUp
- AMD Radeon HD 6450 & 6570: The Line-up is Complete @ InsideHW
- AMD Radeon HD 6450 1 GB @ techPowerUp
- XFX's Radeon HD 6950 1GB takes on Zotac's GeForce GTX 560 Ti AMP @ The Tech Report
Subject: Graphics Cards | April 18, 2011 - 01:24 PM | Jeremy Hellstrom
Tagged: nvidia, gpu, asus, amd
ASUS has released two new cards with their DirectCU II custom cooling solution and accompanying overclock. The are very different as one is a NVIDIA GTX570 and the other an AMD HD6950. [H]ard|OCP was less than impressed with the out of the box overclock of 10MHz on the GPU and simply reference speeds for the GDDR5, so they overclocked the cards to speeds much higher.
"ASUS has released two enthusiast friendly overclocking video cards: the EAH6950 DirectCU II and the ENGTX570 DirectCU II. The question is which one is better, and does overclocking these change the victor. We test each out of the box and overclocked in Lost Planet 2, F1 2010, Civilization V, and Battlefield Bad Company 2."
Here are some more Graphics Card articles from around the web:
- PowerColor HD6850 1GB GDDR5 and PCS+ HD6870 1GB GDDR5 @ iXBT Labs
- ASUS HD 6970 Direct CUII Review @ t-break
- Sapphire HD 5830 Xtreme @ TechwareLabs
- Radeon 6950 fleX, 6870 fleX, 5850 Xtreme, 5830 Xtreme and X58 Pure Black @ HardwareHeaven
- Sapphire HD 6950 FleX 2GB @ TechwareLabs
- Sapphire HD 5830 Xtreme 1GB Video Card Review @ ThinkComputers
- Sapphire Radeon HD 5850 Xtreme 1GB Review @ Techgage
- Where The Open- Source AMD Driver Is At For Modern GPUs @ Phoronix
- Desktop Graphics Card Comparison Guide Rev. 22.4 @ TechARP
- Gigabyte GeForce GTX 550 Ti OC Graphics Card Review @ eTeknix
- ZOTAC GeForce GTX 550 Ti AMP! Edition and Nvidia GeForce GTX 550 Ti SLI Tandem Performance @ X-bit Labs
- EVGA GeForce GTX 590 Classified Quad-SLI Performance Review @Hi Tech Legion
- ASUS GeForce GTX 550 Ti DirectCU TOP Overclocked @ Tweaktown
- MSI N550GTX-Ti Cyclone II Graphics Card @ Bjorn3D
- MSI N560GTX-Ti Twin Frozr II Golden Edition @ Funky Kit