For a few dollars more; synchronized SSD shooters draw first
Subject: Storage | August 8, 2011 - 02:10 PM | Jeremy Hellstrom
Tagged: ssd, sata 6Gps, asynchronous flash, synchronous flash, SF-2281 controller
With the latest SSD controller from SandForce, the SF-2281 SATA III, we have been seeing two different types of flash memory used as the storage medium depending on which vendor or product line you look at. Asynchronous flash and synchronous flash differ in their timing when sending read and write commands, [H]ard|OCP's analogy of synchronous flash working like DDR is perfect as the new variety can send a command on both the rise and the fall of a clock cycle.
The reason this now matters is SATA III, which allows enough bandwidth for synchronous flash to show off its higher speeds; with the previous SATA standard it simply had no impact. That speed impact on the new standard becomes obvious in [H]'s testing, especially when they fill both drives half way and conduct some real world tests. Now that some of both types of drives are on the market, they also look at the price difference between the two types of flash,; a comparison in which the old asynchronous flash does not look good coming out of.
"News flash! All flash NAND is not created equal! Sure, you know about multi-level and single-level NAND when it comes to speed, but what about synchronous and asynchronous NAND inside your shiny new SSD? We have answers and tell you where your money is best spent for real data speed."
Here are some more Storage reviews from around the web:
- Patriot Pyro 120GB SATA III SandForce SF-2281 SSD Review @Hi Tech Legion
- Corsair Performance 3 256GB SSD Review @ Hardware Canucks
- OCZ RevoDrive 3 X2 - 480GB PCIe SSD Review @ HardwareHeaven
- Patriot Torqx 2 256GB @ Tweaktown
- Western Digital WD Elements SE 1 TB USB 2.0 HDD @ reviewstash
- Thermaltake BlacX 5G USB3 HDD Dock @ Funky Kit
- Kingston DataTraveler Ultimate 3.0 G2 32GB Review @ Techgage
- Akasa Noir Max 2.5" Hard Drive Enclosure Review @ eTeknix
OCZ's 240GB Agility 3 SATA 6G drive; can asynchronous flash bring down the price only?
Subject: Storage | June 1, 2011 - 01:38 PM | Jeremy Hellstrom
Tagged: ssd, ocz, agility 3, asynchronous flash
In case you missed it in the rotation at the top, Al has wrapped up his review of the Agility 3 SSD, which utilizes less expensive asynchronous flash memory to bring the MSRP down and hopefully leaves the performance at the same level. Slow is a relative term when you describe SSDs, even one ranked at the bottom of the performance charts will give you better performance than a platter based hard drive. Al does answer the performance question in the review, unfortunately no one can answer the pricing question yet. If these sell like previous models have, retailers will be able to charge whatever they feel like if the supply cannot keep up.
"While the switch to asynchronous flash memory makes the Agility 3 cheaper to produce and therefore sell, the performance dynamic can shift in either direction, varying with what you plan to do with the drive. Many users saw the same type of thing back with the Agility 2 / Vertex 2, and some users actually preferred the cheaper drive performance wise. We may see the same thing here once users (and us) get some actual seat-of-the-pants time logged with it."
Here are some more Storage reviews from around the web:
- OCZ Vertex 3 120GB SSD Review @ Legit Reviews
- OCZ Agility 3 240GB SATA 3 SSD Review @ The SSD Review
- G.Skill Phoenix Evo 115GB SSD Review @ ITShootOut
- OCZ Technology Vertex 3 Max IOPS 240GB @ Tweaktown
- Crucial M4 128GB SSD Review @ The SSD Review
- Samsung 470 Series 256GB SSD - Long Term Test Results @ Legit Reviews
- Intel 510 Series SSD @ InsideHW
- Part flash, all flash or dedicated flash? @ The Register
- Seagate Barracuda Green 2 TB Hard Disk Drive Review @ Hardware Secrets
- Seagate Barracuda XT 3TB Review @ OCC
- Sharkoon Flexi-Drive Extreme Duo 16GB USB 3.0 Thumb Drive @ Tweaktown
- Patriot Supersonic 32 GB USB 3.0 @ techPowerUp

