Subject: Storage | March 31, 2015 - 07:01 PM | Jeremy Hellstrom
Tagged: ssd, sata, Samsung, msata, M.2 SATA, 850 EVO, 500gb, 1TB, 120gb
As Al's review of the 850 EVO exists in a cat like superposition of being biased both for and against Samsung, perhaps you would like a second opinion. That is where The Tech Report's review comes in handy, which was published just a few short hours ago. Their findings were perfectly in line with the others, exactly the same performance as the 2.5" drives but in a nice bite sized form factor. The only drawback is the size, the new M.2's are missing the 1TB model at the moment.
"Samsung's 850 EVO SSD debuted in December inside the usual 2.5" case. Now, the drive is spreading to smaller mSATA and M.2 form factors. We've examined the new drives to see how the mini lineup compares to its full-sized forbear."
Here are some more Storage reviews from around the web:
- Samsung 850 EVO mSATA and M.2 @ Bjorn3d
- Samsung 850 Evo mSATA/M.2 SSD @ HardwareHeaven
- Samsung 850 EVO M.2 SATA SSD @ The SSD Review
- 480GB HyperX Predator M.2 PCIe SSD @ Bjorn3d
- Crucial BX100 SSD @ Benchmark Reviews
- The OCZ Vector 180 SSD Review @ Hardware Canucks
- Enermax 2.5 and 3.5-Inch Mobile Drive Rack Roundup @ eTeknix
- Kingston SDXC UHS-1 Memory Card @ The SSD Review
- Silicon Power Stream S06 4TB USB 3.0 HDD Review @ Madshrimps
- Synology DS1815+ @ techPowerUp
Introduction, Specifications and Packaging
Following the same pattern that Samsung led with the 840 Pro and 840 EVO, history has repeated itself with the 850 Pro and 850 EVO. With the 850 EVO launching late last year and being quite successful, it was only a matter of time before Samsung expanded past the 2.5" form factor for this popular SSD. Today is that day:
Today we will be looking at the MSATA and M.2 form factors. To clarify, the M.2 units are still using a SATA controller and connection, and must therefore be installed in a system capable of linking SATA lanes to its M.2 port. As both products are SATA, the DRAM cache based RAPID mode included with their Magician value added software is also available for these models. We won't be using RAPID for this review, but we did take a look at it in a prior article.
Given that 850 EVOs use VNAND - a vastly different technology than the planar NAND used in the 840 EVO, we suspect it is not subject to the same flash cell drift related issues (hopefully to be corrected soon) in the 840 EVO. Only time will tell for sure on that front, but we have not see any of those issues present in 850 EVO models since their launch.
Cross sectional view of Samsung's 32-layer VNAND. Photo by TechInsights.
Samsung sampled us the M.2 SATA in 120GB and 500GB, and the MSATA in 120GB and 1TB. Since both are SATA-based, these are only physical packaging differences. The die counts are the same as the 2.5" desktop counterparts. While the pair of 120GB models should be essentially identical, we'll throw both in with the results to validate the slight differences in stated specs below.
Subject: Storage | February 22, 2013 - 01:33 PM | Jeremy Hellstrom
Tagged: Samsung 840, Samsung, ssd, 120gb, Samsung MDX
[H]ard|OCP just wrapped up a review of the 120GB Samsung 840, using their own ARM Cortex R4 based MDX controller and TLC memory for storage. They compare the speed of this drive to the 256GB 840 Pro, Kingston's V300 120GB and the Intel 335 240GB to contrast the difference the type of NAND used can make to performance. This is especially evident on the write and latency benchmarks, which fall well behind the competition. From [H]'s testing it is apparent that TLC memory is very vulnerable to reduction in size, the reduced channels really hurt performance and put the 120GB model far behind the larger sized 840s which they have tested with much better results.
"The 120GB Samsung 840 Series SSD features the powerful 8-channel MDX controller and TLC NAND. While this value SSD comes at a very good price, it also features much lower speeds than its larger capacity brethren. We put this value SSD through our suite of steady state tests to see if it can pass muster."
Here are some more Storage reviews from around the web:
- Mushkin Atlas 480GB SSD Review - Performance Meets Capacity In The Ultra World @ SSD Review
- MyDigitalSSD BP4 Slim 7 Series SSD @ SSD Review
- Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB SSD Review @ Techgage
- OCZ Vector 256GB Solid State Drive Review @ Pro-Clockers
- Kingfast F3 Plus SSD @ SSD Review
- TRIM Check: Overview of an essential SSD TRIM functionality tester @ Tweaktown
- Seagate Constellation ES.3 4TB Enterprise Hard Drive Review @ Techgage
- Two 2 Bay NAS Review: Synology DiskStation DS213+ and QNAP TS-269 Pro @ Custom PC Review
- Vantec NexStar NST-D300WS3 WiFi HDD Dock Review @ Hi Tech Legion
- LaCie 5big Thunderbolt: super-fast 20TB NAS device @ Hardware.info
- ASUSTOR AS-604T 4-bay NAS Server for Home and Small Business Review @ Madshrimps
- Asustor AS-604T NAS review: Worthy new competitor for QNAP and Synology @ Hardware.info
- ADATA DashDrive Elite 500GB - External USB3.0 Hard Drive @ FunkyKit
- Icy Dock Blizzard HDD Enclosure & EZ-Dock Docking Station @ Silent PC Review
- Patriot SuperSonic Magnum 256GB USB 3.0 Drive @ Kitguru
- ADATA DashDrive Air AE400 Wireless Storage Reader Review @ Custom PC Review
- Patriot Gauntlet 320GB Wireless Hard Drive @ eTeknix
Subject: Storage | May 5, 2011 - 04:29 PM | Jeremy Hellstrom
Tagged: owc, ocz, ssd, 120gb, sata 6Gps, sandforce
OWC appeared on the SSD scene in partnership with Apple, though they sold drives to PC users as well. Their current generation uses SandForce's Release Candidate firmware for the SF-2281 controller as opposed to OCZ's official firmware that is present in the Vertex 3 SSDs. That is not the only difference, OCZ rolled their own PCB while OWC went with a design that caused a few raised eyebrows at AnandTech. Read their full review to see how the performance evened out.
"I still don't get how OWC managed to beat OCZ to market last year with the Mercury Extreme SSD. The Vertex LE was supposed to be the first SF-1500 based SSD on the market, but as I mentioned in our review of OWC's offering - readers had drives in hand days before the Vertex LE even started shipping.
I don't believe the same was true this time around. The Vertex 3 was the first SF-2200 based SSD available for purchase online, but OWC was still a close second. Despite multiple SandForce partners announcing drives based on the controller, only OCZ and OWC are shipping SSDs with SandForce's SF-2200 inside."
Here is some more Tech News from around the web:
- OCZ Vertex 3 240GB SSD Review @ Hardware Canucks
- Corsair Performance 3 2x128GB SSD RAID Report @ Tweaktown
- OWC Mercury Extreme Pro 6G 240GB SSD Review - 500MB/s Sets The New Standard @ The SSD Review
- Intel SSD 320 Series (25nm) - 300Gb @ Funky Kit
- Intel SSD 510 Series 120GB @ TechSpot
- OCZ Technology Vertex 3 120GB Retail Solid State Drive @ Tweaktown
- Kingston SSDNow V+100 vs. Samsung 470 Series 256 GB SSD @ Hardware Secrets
- Icy Dock MB991IK-B @ Hardware Bistro
- Netgear Stora Home Media Network Storage Review @ Legit Reviews
- Icy Dock SSD 4 in 1 SSD RAID Cages and SSD Conversion Kits - A Quick Look @ The SSD Review
- ICY DOCK MB974SP-B Internal 4-bay Enclosure Review @ ThinkComputers
- LSI 9265-8i 6Gbps MegaRAID Card RAID 5 Tested! - Just The 9265 & 8 Micron C300 SSDs @ The SSD Review
- Patriot LX Pro 32GB Class 10 SDHC Memory Card @ Hi Tech Legion
- Patriot 32GB Supersonic USB 3.0 Flash Drive Review @ Madshrimps